Search results

Thanks guys. I'll definitely be back for more. Joe Abercrombie has occupied much of my attention of late, so I'll cover a few other areas of interest in the next two months, and maybe pick up again next year.

1. Unruly - David Mitchell - 9/10 2. A Man Called Ove - Fredrik Blackman - 7/10 3. The Book of Doors - Gareth Brown - 8/10 4. Hitler's British Traitors - Tim Tate - 4/10 5. 1984 - George Orwell - 7/10 6. Big Beacon by Alan Partridge - Steve Coogan et al - 6/10 7. The Third Man - Graham Greene -...

Probably not true. I imagine he trained alone because he had a slight knock or something.

Scholes appreciates good footballing qualities no matter who the player plays for.

I'd have some sympathy if they had been given a steer that he won it, but there is no evidence of this. It's more likely they thought he had won it because of the massive PR campaign orchestrated by the club.

He'll be booed even more from now on, and they (him and RM) will attribute it to racism, rather than him being a spoilt, entitled, petulant child.

Hope they get him, only for us to tempt him away in 18 months. Or maybe Khaldoon should hire him as a consultant for some other business interest.

Hopefully the journalists that vote will remember this in future, and vote accordingly.

I did the same with Wolf Hall, many years ago. Also saw your post on the other thread, with a picture of the extract.

The difference between Vini Jnr and Rodri. Only one has an entourage.

I thought they paid out based on the 90 minute score these days.

Zirkzee is stealing a living from United. I arrange veterans football once a week, and I'm serious when I say we've had better players than him.

Hahahaha. Out for longer than first planned? So they planned for him to be injured? Seems legit, but wouldn't put it past those idiots.

https://rainhillhighschool.org.uk/about/liverpool-football-club-academy I think this is the incident you are referring to, below: https://www.nbcsports.com/soccer/news/liverpool-banned-from-signing-academy-players

They knew it was a goal all the time. The onfield team deliberately disallowed the goal so that the VAR could come along and overturn the decision. This devious ploy serves three purposes. 1. It contributes a positive mark to this league table, to make it look like City are benefiting from VAR...

Both my sons went to MMU. Both now in their twenties and doing well for themselves. One is a Sales Director, the other a maths teacher in Harrow.

He was a personal trainer. A friend of ours was one of his clients.

"As a goalkeeper, I'd be furious". Well the actual goalkeeper wasn't furious, and this is quite indicative that the goalkeeper didn't think there was an offence caused by Bernardo.

Acceptable if you believe it. That reaction was way more than being pleased for a friend. It was a display of joy because of the suffering of an enemy - the same reaction you would have to your own team scoring or winning a game, or having a major decision go in their favour.

Nothing at all wrong with Perry Groves' reaction to the goal. He just waited to see the outcome and said it was a very good header. Matterface showed his true colours though.