Search results

The risk is real

Thanks. PS sorry to disappoint but more than happy to advance my career/income streams though (not that 115 in itself has done that)

Last reply. Believe who and what you like. But I am not making it up.

Honestly, don't be so naive. Or at least be open minded enough to accept that the club has a plan for some possible negative outcomes even if it is confident it will prevail. Honestly, it is so obvious and basic that I don't know why I have to say it.

None of it is welcomed. Not one bit

Apologies. I didn’t realise anyone on here really believed City “welcomed” this whole fiasco. It’s PR not reality. But sure, take it at face value if it comforts you.

This is my final reply to this crap. Believe what you like. Believe who you like. Believe I speak to a range of people to get as clear a picture as possible or believe I make it all up. Your call. But if you think the only time Pannick has engaged in a year on this topic is to reply to Paladin...

I never said they did publicly. But surely you can’t be that naive - there is a difference between PR and the real world. Only fools would foresee no risk at all.

MAY say

I’ve said that. Almost no chance of anything but a high award of our costs (which means 90%) unless the Commission says the claim was baseless and brought in bad faith. Which is something it won’t say.

I never said that. But likewise I’m hardly likely to tell you who I speak to. But it’s not just one individual that acknowledges there is risk that some things go against the club. And anyone that didn’t recognise that risk wouldn’t be credible anyway.

I don't reply to every question. And the answer to this one is pretty obvious.

Comfort yourself however you like. What I’ve written is fact on not just based on generalisations. City are confident but not certain or complacent.

I said City are confident. I mentioned soft signals multiple times in the past. They are confident. But they don't KNOW and acknowledge the decision may say things they don't like.

I don't think so. I still have no idea what you meant above.

No idea what you are talking about. If you mean my post of w.82 that is because you made up rule w.82.3 so I was showing you a) it didn't exist b) even if it did, which it didn't, as you say it is an appeal rule. Either way there is no rule that you quoted - it was made up nonsense.

Very good idea is not KNOW. And I KNOW they don't KNOW of even some of the fundamental questions.

For the millionth time, until they see the decision they do not know where the Commission is on even some fundamental matters. City are obviously confident, but then so are the PL. And there is nothing happening in the background except waiting for the decision. As the most senior legal person...

Paladin has sent me the email - it is real.

Waste of words. Make your own judgment based on whatever info you have or can find. As I do.