Search results

Semantics of what 'forced out' means aside, I don't disagree with you or what eiher of us is saying, so I will drop this one there if that's ok. On your other points, fully agree the fans deserve direct talks and hope they get them. Fully acknowledge the appearence of how it was dealt with...

Technically there is less 'corporate' than before the expansion, if you account for what the NS had previously, and how it worked proportionally. Without even getting into semantics of what corporate is or isn't.

If we are guessing numbers, 1100 seats is as logical as 500. Based on the fact that the other GA+ was 650 seats to 300 bar capacity. All we know is that there will be a new 500 capacity bar offering in the City Hall. How many seats are associated with that or what it does to the overall City...

Don't want to revisit this old thing again, but really don't think we can say anything for definite at this point. The statement left so much to interpretation, none of it conclusive. One to watch. Maybe those affected will get a clearer picture before anyone else will, if the club take up...

I think you getting hung up on a wording technicallity mate. What does forced out mean? If we go down that route, then unless you are saying someone will be literally picking a fan up out of their seat, then technically he is right and you are wrong. Does it matter? Nobody is denying people...

The offers by the club have been reported out there. Whether they are fair or sufficient, it is imo really up to those affected to decide and not for me to pass comment on perhaps. But it is unfair to suggest the club aren’t trying or offering options, including staying in their current seats...

Whether you agree or disagree, I struggle to see how you don't see the logic in the timing of the email and announcement. Proper rock and hard place scenario that. That said, totally agree further talks should be offered/welcomed thereafter. Even if nothing else for appearences, but hopefully...

I think they well deserve a talk with the club, and hopefully the club welcome the chance to engage with them, as their email suggests in its promise to do all they can to make the transition as smooth as possible. Agree on the communication and timing, I don't see any other way that could...

I get that, although in this case I would think it might well be more for the purposes of tournament games as bluemooncas suggests, and the article quoting that, than a loss in construction. For one, nobody yet knows that and I doubt the club would let it slip in such a way, credit to Levets...

Could well be mate. Good shout.

Admit it, you rapped it when you read it back!

This album is like a terribly made cacio e pepe. They didn't grate the cheese into a fine enough dust where it instantly emulsifies on contact with the latent heat warm pasta water coating. They don't understand the difference between a Parmigiano and a Pecorino Romano, in fact, i'm pretty sure...

He's a very naughty boy!

Tell me why are we, so blind to see..

I am guessing just as much as you are mate. Can't see them losing 200+ seats from such a prime location in the new stand.

Totally get it, and no disagreement whatsoever. I very much welcomed the effort in the thread being kept apolitical fwiw.

Wouldn't/shouldn't change seat numbers, and maybe too soon to claim that. Imho. The article could also have got the number wrong, given the various versions.

Any seats lost to that 3rd screen or whatever is going where the '4th' screen would otherwise be?

Has there been any confirmation on Kovacic's injury? Because he does have form for being declared dead and then playing the next game.

If it was, there should in theory be another one in its mirrored corresponding position/node on the other side.