Search results

Hot take stats are bollocks. But easy to play that game. In his 3 matches for Chelsea: 1st - Key Passes 1st - Shot Creating Actions 1st - Goal Creating Actions 1st - xG (non penalty) 2nd - xA 1st - Touches in Opp Pen Box However. in the court of Chelsea opinion he will have issues because he...

Relegation 6 pointer next week :) United win and go ahead of liverpool haha

Personally, I hate these aggregator quotes when the full context of what Pep was saying is lost. Simply, it was Pep talking in generic terms yet again about "happy face". Something he has done repeatedly over the years. Wonder why you've posted it on here? Do you think it was specifically about...

Link to Antonio's full comments below. Think he was impressed :) https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0cshf0y

He did. He wrote a full article about it. It reads as if his comments from the the Liverpool game don't exist which kind of sums up the man..

The Delaney tweet is a Hall of Fame contender. Just got to laugh at the twat: Talking of Hall of Fame I watched the Sky 30 min HOF special on Aguero. Excellent for those who haven't seen it. Excellent for one small thing. Of all people they cut to this dirtbag a few times for his "expert"...

Def not the case on BBC Radio 5 Live. MOTD/Football Focus not too bad either. The website and twitter etc a different matter. And Simon Stone is of course a joke.

Lots of v good stuff on R5Live if you listen selectively and City well represented - Nedum, Michael Brown, Micah etc Even Kyle Walker was on 3 or 4 times last year including on one show for an hour or so. He enjoys doing it and will be in the media when he hangs his boots up if he doesn't go...

Stefan's take (@projectriver) on it 12 months ago is in the podcast link below. If you've not heard it before it's highly recommended if you like the complex and technical! Overall it's the best coverage of this case out there from a City perspective. i've just re-listened and it answers many...

Changed from earlier and now reported by Keegan as £225,000pw,

City are always good even when we are poor. By that I mean we consistently create the better chances and that categorically happened yesterday - 5 big chances against Liverpool is unprecedented. Sure, they exposed us but fuck me "the best back 4 in the world", er, wasn't.

We've had the upper hand since the "kryptonite" Liverpool in 2018. We've struggled more against United. W3 D4 L1 in the league since 18/19. And at least two of those draws could easily and deservedly been wins (Mahrez). 0-0 2-1 1-3 4-0 1-1 4-1 2-2 2-2 Then it is 1 Community Shield each (not...

Yep thats def the rule when going down on a block...but that's not a block as such so also not sure

Better xG on that link : City 2.26 - 2.00 Liverpool. Intuitively that feels right. Big chances City 5-4 Liverpool Probably updated :)

Different on Sofa Score. 5 Big Chances and 1 scored. Usual story :) Where's your xG from? Looks wrong to me because you had it at 1.3 or something at half-time. The only one I've seen is 3.01 City and 2.25 Liver, City on the right hand side:

Zero incredulity from City so Moylan talking shit.

He looked good the other night but no where near 100% according to this article Sounds like he enjoyed his hols :) https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertkidd/2022/07/29/manchester-citys-kevin-de-bruyne-i-understand-what-my-body-and-mind-want/?sh=5fa12a872897

Don't undersell it.. it was a 14 game WINNING run that won us the league :) (they finished with 9 on the bounce). Media do bang on too much though about "unbeaten" runs. 18/19 they only lost 1 game - to us. We lost 4. 21/22 they lost 2 games. We lost 3. Fuck unbeaten runs. Just win more. We do.

Some one must had had a word - the article is in stark contrast to another one they published a couple of weeks back: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/30/a-massive-betrayal-how-londons-olympic-legacy-was-sold-out

1-0 mr haaland