Search results

Impact assessment is still to be done. It is due to be scheduled to be completed by the scheduled end of this parliament.

Oh yes, immigration targets over the last 7 years is a great example. And the £350m a week in the last 12 months.

well that's a very thin sample I would say. 1800 odd people from 60m.

Well only on blue moon can people come out with this kind of statement. How did you extrapolate that number ? Curious now.

Of course it matters. If Gibraltar were the disputed territory after Brexit, would U.K. threaten Spain with nukes ?

That's open to speculation I guess.

a minority on blue moon may be, I wouldn't be so sure if a nationwide referendum were to take place with this question.

Since when do UK, France and USA care for UN rules? And my point on 3 nuclear armed countries was to do with the fact that Ukraine disarmed itself of ICBMs after guarantees from the aforementioned 3 nuclear states which Russia must know.

Thanks so Russia didn't feel the annihilation threat from the 3 nuclear armed countries and went ahead with the annexation anyway. I see these threats must work in some way I guess.

So what you have proven or happened in Crimea shows that displomacy doesn't always work. Agreed. You have not proved that threat of annihilation works ! Because it did not happen. are American threats of annihilation to North Korea stopping them from missile tests ?

Not sure what or how you proved a point in that sentence. May be it is the same language used by trump while tweeting after midnight.

They come from Trump fan club hence the obsession with North Korea and the nuclear weapons. I bet daily mail didn't call the audience biased or left wing tonight.

The threat of annihilation only works when it's real. Annexing of Crimea happened on the current govt watch ! I bet they must have said millions of times that they would use the nuclear weapons but made no difference to what Russia did.

I admire the honesty of a politician whether I agree with the stance or not. It's like people in this country want their leader to say they would use nuclear weapons just to satisfy their ego and feel comfortable. It doesn't matter to them whether the leader would actually do it not. Its...

A statement from a weak and wobbly under pressure leader must act as a great deterrent I guess who has a "liar liar" song out after her.

Much easier to duck out than justifying the post I guess ! Using the medic example and talking about enemy knowing there will be no retribution, I wonder what context that is in.

The way people are talking about nuclear weapons on this thread and the way it is seen as an issue in debates, may be people in this country deserve Trump like character who would be trigger happy and kill millions by using a nuclear weapon.

Comparing a medic to have the training of being able to take 'a' life and a politician to take 'millions' of lives is not really a fair comparison even in principle.

So a politician should be dishonest with himself or the voters. I thought I had seen it all on blue moon.

The lack of knowledge of the tax system worldwide is baffling amongst people on here. If anyone moves to Ireland, it will not be because of corp tax increase, it will be because of no free tariff trade with EU.