Search results

Well, partly very good and uplifting, partly very bad and depressing. We'll win next week.

Well, thats their attackers nullified, then hoof it up, hoof it up, baby hoof it up.

Strongbow kicking in. Nerves under temporary control.

Post of the thread.

Is it to early to start drinking? My french nerves killing me.

Yes, he was UEFA's choice, and it's possible he voted in support of his principles, knowing they would lose. I don't know if this is common practice, but in any case, he voted against a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence. He was comfortably satisfied with UEFA's case, and that is truly...

Wonder if they will park the bus again.

Still, if a law professor widely considered one of the most experienced and respected arbitrators at the CAS had his way UEFA would have won. There's always a risk.

Re faith in panels. If we had two "Professor Ulrich Haas" on our panel we're fnucked.

Might get tasty.

Does The Central Element still exist?

Take a bow

There is a God

Word. I guess they saw the PL faux rules on related parties coming years ago—that's why they were so aggressive about the PwC report in 2013.

If I remember it correctly City argued in CAS that Sheikh Mansour was a member of the federal UAE gov and not the emirate of Abu Dhabi govt so he had no influence over companies that was owned by the Abu Dhabi gov.

About time then..

When did we play Exeter the last time?

What was PwC's view? Was it that Mansour's half-brother was the CEO of Etihad, or that Mansour was the Chairman of the President's Office for his brother Khalifa, the ruler of Abu Dhabi and the founder of Etihad?

We will be there.

A victory for football!