Search results

Guaranteed personality.

You sound Australian.

Seems like Pep probably planned to sub him for Grealish after an hour anyway, but not squaring the ball accelerated that a bit. A 15 minute penalty.

Diamond in the rough.

Musampa started the 1996 Final for Ajax, no?

That’s it. So, unless I’m missing somebody, 19 players in the past 25 years played both a Champions League Final and a competitive match for City. That’s more than I would have thought, honestly.

Missed another one then. But there’s still one left from Bayern.

Demichelis is 17. Of course, Pep and Txiki are the special cases. So, the single most obscure City-affiliated player to have started a Champions League Final in the past 25 years is...

Almost to the finish line now.

1. Musampa 2. Cole 3. Lampard 4. Y. Toure 5. K. Toure 6. Hargreaves 7. Schmeichel 8. Tevez 9. Gundogan 10. Boateng 11. Anelka 12. McManaman 13. Savic 14. Milner 15. Sylvinho 16. Maicon 17. Van Bommel 18. Demichelis 19. Played for Bayern Forgot Schmeichel. Didn’t count Karius or Trippier...

Kiki Musampa, 1 of 17 City affiliated players to start a Champions League Final in the last 25 years. Can you name the others?

Preferred Elano’s style of surgically rippling the inside netting. Though it’s hard to choose from a group of four that never missed.

I don't disagree with your larger point, and they definitely bossed us at times, but they still managed to concede six over the two games and completely shat themselves there for awhile in the second half at the Etihad.

What is comfortable about a 77th minute score to win on away goals?

https://www.si.com/longform/manchester-city-2012-epl-title-final-day-oral-history/index.html If you like to read.

SWP

Without knowing for sure, I'll guess the club would have been willing to subsidize a loan like they did for their other high wage players, but Yaya chose to stay rather than find a place where he would play more often.

Should be on Fox Sports 1.

The most disturbing aspect of the series for me is that Avery and Dassey were convicted separately using two completely different timelines and narratives that could not both simultaneously be true.

I always read it as a scrunched up 'something like that', like the way some commentators like Stewart Robson pronounce Manchester as 'Mchr'. Not being from England, I have no idea if that is common phrasing or if he just can't speak correctly.