i imagine that when the case fails the PL will say that the allegations were made by their member clubs and they had no choice but to investigate. and of course refuse to name which clubs.
hmmm, can't really see any other way to read that other than as you say.
i wonder if that phrasing is the norm in legal cases. sure a few here can comment?
Much as I’d see the funny side, no.
City are my only concern.
Ideally I’d like to see high quality derbies each and every season resulting in City winning bags of silverware.
Besides, looking back, the red tears in 2012 were awesome.
Kev and Gundo are 5 years older than Jack. I’d replace them first and play Jack inside before considering selling him. I don’t think that is straitjacket material. Considering selling him is.
Yeah I know a major cock up is unlikely. I just take some comfort from the thought that it’s happened recently.
I also take comfort from our successes in the APT ruling. I know they’re not related but it’s a demonstration in competency and that we know what we’re doing.
Anyway as we move from...
Rightly or wrongly I always take your posts as highly likely to be correct. A piece of this complex puzzles framework if you like.
And whilst I have no reason to disagree with this assessment, the PL aren’t infallible. The Leicester case being the prime example. The PL presumably had legal...
No. Because I’ve realised that you’re a wind up merchant. Nothing more. All post either negative or outright argumentative. And to be honest you come across as a massive dick. Prattle on if you like but you’re on ignore now.
Form since we went top at the end of October would see us rock bottom. No escaping that. But form is temporary. The question is how temporary.
What I can say is that I’d rather we were relegated than sack Pep.
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.