10 clubs vote against giving EFL a share of the PL money

[Lavinda Past]

im surprised that united are not one of the clubs

Late to the party. Not enough added time.

 

[cleavers]

It better not be he’s on gardening leave and would be breaking the terms of his contract

You don't think they're talking to him in his garden ?

 

[PragueBlue]

What a surprise. Most of the **** clubs - dippers, arsenal, spurs and Chelsea - are there. The only surprise is the rags are missing.

 

[chesterbells]

This isn’t really about who voted for or against today, but a more general point.

Don’t the PL already give bucketloads of cash to the lower leagues? I’ve thought for a few years now the model of 4 divisions of full time professional clubs isn’t necessarily sustainable. It might have been in the 30s or 50s when there weren’t as many competing alternatives for leisure time, but we’re not in Kansas anymore.

Why does there have to be 92 pro clubs?
If some of those clubs ended up as semi pro they could still exist if enough people wanted to watch couldn’t they?

 

[cleavers]

Why does there have to be 92 pro clubs?

There's a lot more than 92 to be fair, most of the national league is pro.

...and why not ?

Personally I think the money should filter down further than it does.

 

[NZBlue]

You don't think they're talking to him in his garden ?

Cunningly disguised as garden gnomes

 

[cleavers]

Cunningly disguised as garden gnomes

.....or garden phones ;-)

 

[City Hobgoblin]

What a surprise. Most of the **** clubs - dippers, arsenal, spurs and Chelsea - are there. The only surprise is the rags are missing.

Ratcliffe is currying favour

 

[oldhamblue]

Quite surprised Everton are not one of them. They were in the original cartel in the 80's

 

[paulchapo]

Could be the tie up between Ineos and Mubadala in Canada which will mean Scuffy Jim will know Khaldoon

Fuck tax dodging Jim. He wants to use our ground while the swamp is developed/rebuilt.