Totally agree.Its amazing how many fans, and worryingly city fans on here, continuously quote “he’s not worth £100m”. £100m was his release clause, not his worth. Its what we HAD to pay to get him
Prick that sits near me continuously quotes the £100m figure whilst throwing in ,”for £100m he should be dribbling past 4 players and bagging. Should be scoring 25 goals a season”.
Its fucking painful to listen to it
So do you think it was a good decision to pay that amount for him or not ?Yeah I agree with you on that. Whilst I'm unconvinced that Grealish is good enough for us and we probably paid double what he's worth, it's not his fault we paid that much for him and it's unfair to have unrealistic expectations of him based on a fee that he had no control over.
I'd say not judging by the post.So do you think it was a good decision to pay that amount for him or not ?
I think we probably could've found someone better for far less money but I can also acknowledge that the best manager in the world wanted him and the club obviously felt we could afford it which is all that really matters.So do you think it was a good decision to pay that amount for him or not ?
Its amazing how many fans, and worryingly city fans on here, continuously quote “he’s not worth £100m”. £100m was his release clause, not his worth. Its what we HAD to pay to get him
Prick that sits near me continuously quotes the £100m figure whilst throwing in ,”for £100m he should be dribbling past 4 players and bagging. Should be scoring 25 goals a season”.
Its fucking painful to listen to it
Its amazing how many fans, and worryingly city fans on here, continuously quote “he’s not worth £100m”. £100m was his release clause, not his worth. Its what we HAD to pay to get him
Prick that sits near me continuously quotes the £100m figure whilst throwing in ,”for £100m he should be dribbling past 4 players and bagging. Should be scoring 25 goals a season”.
Its fucking painful to listen to it
Its amazing how many fans, and worryingly city fans on here, continuously quote “he’s not worth £100m”. £100m was his release clause, not his worth. Its what we HAD to pay to get him
Prick that sits near me continuously quotes the £100m figure whilst throwing in ,”for £100m he should be dribbling past 4 players and bagging. Should be scoring 25 goals a season”.
Its fucking painful to listen to it
But the fee influences the salary, surely? If I'm an agent and a club is willing to break the British transfer fee for my player, I'm damn sure he's going to be making towards the top end of their pay structureTo play Devils Advocate, ignore the fee, which Jack had no influence over. Should fans be right in expecting more from one of our top earners? Ignore the fee, he’s our third highest earner, so, it’s fair to suggest he should be somewhere close to our third highest performer. I’m not sure many would say he’s our 3rd highest performer.
But the fee influences the salary, surely? If I'm an agent and a club is willing to break the British transfer fee for my player, I'm damn sure he's going to be making towards the top end of their pay structure