1884 or 1894 ?

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by Hamann Pineapple, 21 Mar 2013.

  1. EricBrooksGhost

    EricBrooksGhost

    Joined:
    19 Oct 2010
    Messages:
    2,203
    More impatience from our fans ...
     
  2. Falastur

    Falastur

    Joined:
    27 May 2009
    Messages:
    3,954
    I'd be interested to see Gary James' take on this.
     
  3. Mad Eyed Screamer

    Mad Eyed Screamer

    Joined:
    26 Nov 2010
    Messages:
    24,984
    Location:
    From Moston to Boston
    I've just been checking my copies of the fanzine ''Billy Meredith's Toothpick'' and it definitely states 1884
     
  4. Gary James

    Gary James

    Joined:
    21 Feb 2008
    Messages:
    3,799
    Location:
    'Manchester City Folklore' see @garyjameswriter
    "Manchester The City Years" (my latest book, published in August) starts with the story of the area in the 1850s and goes through the key steps that led to the first known game and on to the formation of MCFC in 1894.

    Within the period 1857 to 1894 there are many key decision making dates when games took place or clubs were formed or names changed. None of the printed dates however tell the full story and it's important to understand and interpret those dates and actions based on all available material.

    It is a fact that MCFC came in to being in 1894 and it was put forward by all involved that this was a new club - so that's MCFC's formation. The same happened with Ardwick in 1887, Gorton in 1884 and so on. None of that however tells the full story and the lineage. For me one of the strongest aspects of MCFC has been the people - and there are people directly involved who in the early 1900s talked of the club's roots going back to 1880 and St. Mark's. Heavy research in dusty old archives (much of this stuff is not online) has always backed this up. There has been confusion in the period 1882-1884 but Paul Toovey did some excellent research on this (please read his book - it simply presents information as he found it and makes some interpretation). Even that confusion didn't alter the views of those involved at the start that this was the same club.

    The one thing that was always clear was that some of the people continued to be involved with the club and claim it as the same organisation from 1880 through to the 1940s - as they were directly involved I think their views have to be remembered.

    Personally, I've never been convinced that the Nov 1880 game with Macclesfield Baptists was the first - I believe there would have been at least one earlier game. Reports in all the credible newspapers of the period do not show a report, nor do they show information about the formation, but I believe there's enough evidence out there to show that it could have happened (and that's the main point really - lots of circumstantial evidence but actual facts are harder to prove).

    I'd urge everyone to read "Manchester The City Years" (borrow it from a library - it's usually free and if they don't have it in ask them to order it). The book covers City's full history and contains almost 500,000 words but even then there's so much more I wanted to include.
     
  5. Gary James

    Gary James

    Joined:
    21 Feb 2008
    Messages:
    3,799
    Location:
    'Manchester City Folklore' see @garyjameswriter
    Nice - did you get the free 78 record with issue 2? "Songs from the terraces" - in includes: "Super City from Hyde Road", "Where were you when you weren't in existence?", "The umpire doesn't know what he's doing?" and "Crystal Palace, Crystal Palace, we're the famous Brewerymen and we're off to Crystal Palace".
     
  6. charliebigspuds

    charliebigspuds

    Joined:
    30 Aug 2008
    Messages:
    10,452
    Location:
    Manchester
    I can't click the link atm but that's what i thought and we started wearing the black top with the white cross in 1884, don't think we had a recorded particular strip until then
     
  7. Gary James

    Gary James

    Joined:
    21 Feb 2008
    Messages:
    3,799
    Location:
    'Manchester City Folklore' see @garyjameswriter
    No photographic evidence of a kit before 1884 - that image was uncovered a decade ago - but we have comments about kits worn before 1884.
     
  8. Dave Ewing's Back 'eader

    Dave Ewing's Back 'eader

    Joined:
    9 Mar 2007
    Messages:
    44,843
    Location:
    Upwind of the Mangrove Swamp
    If it was 1884 and not 1880 does it mean we'll get Falcao in the summer?
     
  9. He's in the bag:

    [​IMG]
     
  10. Falastur

    Falastur

    Joined:
    27 May 2009
    Messages:
    3,954
    Thanks Gary. So are you saying that this book is getting its stuff wrong and making up things in an attempt to be authoritative, or is it just that it's a little misguided in trying to put a strict date on a fluid period of history?

    I take it that you must've had some interaction with the making of this book, given how you know this stuff before it's out?

    Incidentally, I'd already come across your Manchester The City Years as I was looking for this other book on Amazon, but thanks for the tip on the Toovey book, I'll look into that.
     

Share This Page