First goal not sure how he is supposed to save that, it was a bit of a freak goal the way way he just hit it without even looking at the goal(in fact he was looking the other way) and the way it bobbled to the inside of the post.
Second goal, maybe he could have done better but really if any of our players, against ANY keeper in the world, gets into the position Vinicius was in and it's anything but a goal and they are saying he missed a sitter.
Third goal, it's Benzema from the the penalty spot. Who really expected anything but a goal for a start? Who really expected him to gamble on staying still waiting for the dink(something he never normally tries), rather than picking a side(something he might have done some prep on)?
I can't believe people are comparing him to Bravo. Some of the goals Bravo was conceding were mistakes. Most of Eddie's aren't mistakes at all(he always seems to save some for Spurs though, annoyingly).
They only thing I'd say is we've not seen him hit run of form where he's making worldy saves that he's no right to saves. It's kind of hard when City dominate possession for so long to have one of those nights where he wins us a game also. I suppose he could still improve in that sense though. Does that mean he's shit or we should get rid though? Does it heck!