Perhaps another epic to rival the Ronaldinho saga!mat said:One of the theories involved a planned US Military training exercise (which documents are available on) which involved how would they react to civilian planes being used as weapons. The Government at the time wanted a smoking gun to get into Iraq and believed "another Pearl Harbour" would do it.
20 pages minimum this thread methinks....
jimharri said:Perhaps another epic to rival the Ronaldinho saga!mat said:One of the theories involved a planned US Military training exercise (which documents are available on) which involved how would they react to civilian planes being used as weapons. The Government at the time wanted a smoking gun to get into Iraq and believed "another Pearl Harbour" would do it.
20 pages minimum this thread methinks....
And, pray tell, where are the crew and passengers, and for that matter the plane, that flew into the Pentagon right now if, as you suggest, they didn't actually fly into the Pentagon? They took off from an airport, the people who died on that plane actually existed pre 9/11 and now don't. Where are they?bluezi said:There is so much weight to say the Pentagon did to themselves and nowt but a grainy video of an old man who they cant find to blame it on.
That's in your expert opinion as a plane crash investigator is it?RobinJo said:Very interesting how the pentagon roof managed to stay on when the tail on the plane would have brought it down.
Matty said:And, pray tell, where are the crew and passengers, and for that matter the plane, that flew into the Pentagon right now if, as you suggest, they didn't actually fly into the Pentagon? They took off from an airport, the people who died on that plane actually existed pre 9/11 and now don't. Where are they?bluezi said:There is so much weight to say the Pentagon did to themselves and nowt but a grainy video of an old man who they cant find to blame it on.
As I said, total, total bollocks the lot of it.
Matty said:That's in your expert opinion as a plane crash investigator is it?RobinJo said:Very interesting how the pentagon roof managed to stay on when the tail on the plane would have brought it down.
Matty said:That's in your expert opinion as a plane crash investigator is it?RobinJo said:Very interesting how the pentagon roof managed to stay on when the tail on the plane would have brought it down.
If you don't know what it was then how can you be sure is wasn't supposed to be there? Plus, if as you say there was something on the bottom of the plane then, by definition you're accepting the damage was caused by a plane, which calls into question your "the roof would have come down because of the planes tail" statement. It can't be BOTH conspiracies at the same time!!!RobinJo said:Matty said:And, pray tell, where are the crew and passengers, and for that matter the plane, that flew into the Pentagon right now if, as you suggest, they didn't actually fly into the Pentagon? They took off from an airport, the people who died on that plane actually existed pre 9/11 and now don't. Where are they?bluezi said:There is so much weight to say the Pentagon did to themselves and nowt but a grainy video of an old man who they cant find to blame it on.
As I said, total, total bollocks the lot of it.
There was something on the bottom of the plane, don't know what it was. But surely if this was at an airport to start with, someone must of noticed it.