I agree it could well be seen as poorly expressed but we have to accept that City/CFG are a global brand these days, whether we like it or not. It's that sort of recognition and following that gets us sponsorships, particularly ones that don't involve Abu Dhabi.
And you also have to understand that CityXtra seemingly tend to amplify any negative they can, hence why I've blocked them on Twitter.
Did she say those exact words? Did she say them recently or a while ago? Is there a wider context? I don't know but I'm not going to lose my shit over it. Around 2/3rds of our OSC members are outside the UK. So it's quite possible that 80-90% of the total OSC membership are outside Manchester.
I want our overseas fans to feel part of the City family but the fans who regularly pass through the turnstiles should be top priority.
Let me try to reply to this in a reasoned way, Prestwich, because you're a poster I always find worth reading.
I'm absolutely not losing my shit over this. What I
am claiming is that it's insensitive. However, I'm at a point where that no longer surprises very much. And that's a bad thing in itself.
A number of the professionals that City have brought in in various capacities are, of course, not City supporters. It seems to me at least possible that they're not interested in football, or weren't until they got this gig. They are marketing managers, finance controllers, communications directors.
Football, however, is not like a commodity that one shifts around. It's not like being in oil futures.
Any football supporter — from Barnley to Barcelona — could tell them that there is a level of affective investment, sometimes from grandfather, to father, to son, from grandmother to daughter to granddaughter, which is quite unlike anything else that I can think of in modern life, unless it be people who attend a church, a synagogue, a mosque, and who obtain a deeply uplifting sense of spiritual nourishment from that experience.
I'm barely exaggerating. It's
not like following a musician, whether they be Taylor Swift or Morrissey (yes, that's a deliberately provocative piece of playfulness on my part), because no musician, no artist, no politician, can lose over and over, and be relegated, tumbling down the divisions and finally, in a ritual of humiliation, be expelled from their league. Nor can they lift a symbol — a cup that's not even made of silver — against their direst rivals on a stage witnessed by literally millions, an event I was privileged to be at two seasons ago at Wembley. And which I will not forget till I die.
City are a business, are a brand, of course on a global scale. That is necessary, and we must welcome it like grown-ups who know how the world works. If I meet someone from Kuala Lumpur or Flagstaff, Arizona who says they are a City “fan” I am of course polite with them, even quite welcoming. Do I regard them as family? No, I'm afraid, really not.(There's some fucking idiots in the “family” at the Etihad, but hey, isn't that true of so many flesh and blood families?) Somebody earlier in the thread made a distinction between “fan” and “supporter”. I've always stood fast by that distinction. A supporter is someone who
supports. It matters not a jot to me that what a supporter pays out of their pocket to go through that turnstile does not cover a twentieth of City's running costs. It's a truism, but it does not take account of the
vital fact that it's hard-earned cash that may well have involved sacrifices for that particular supporter (and their family), and in any case comes right out of their pocket. Within their limits, they are supporting the team and the club financially by giving back partly what they've earned, by doing a job which, for all I know, they may hate every single minute of. The joy comes on that Saturday afternoon. If they're lucky (and we've been very, very lucky…).
But there's something else, even more crucial. What did the two Covid seasons show us, if not that, you take people out of the ground, no-one there apart from coaching staff and a few club administrators, and it really is just twenty-two grown men in kind of silly uniforms running around chasing a bag full of wind on a patch of grass for one-and-half hours of their time? The Covid seasons were the manifest — painfully manifest —
reductio ad absurdam that demonstrated, in embarrassing simplicity, that, without the supporters, there really is no fucking point!
The supporters, those who go often/sometimes/rarely (no matter, I'm not going to get into that) through the turnstile to take their seat and support their team are the beating heart of a club. Any club.
And finally, that brings me to one little grouse, one thing that's starting to get ever so slightly up my nose. Pep regularly goes public in saying, “We need our supporters”. Regularly, the team goes over to clap the away support. That's fine and dandy. He means it, too. He's not being insincere, he's not saying it because he's been told to say it by the comm team. I don't think so. But here's the thing: I'd like someone, just an ordinary fan (myself maybe) but in any case not someone officially employed by the club, to sit down across a table from him, look him in the eye, and quietly explain to him that there is a terrible disjunction, a growing rift, between what he's legitimately calling for, and insensitive statements of the sort that got this thread going. Because it's not the guy or gal in Kuala Lumpur or Flagstaff who's giving their voice in that stadium, groaning or cheering, but in any case being present to give the event meaning. (And I know, there are plenty at the Etihad who sit like stuffed dummies, I don't even know how they do it, I'm not judging them even, I'm as if plugged in to a ten-thousand volt machine on the all too rare occasions when I'm there — because I'm not setting myself up as a model supporter, far from it — it's bad for me, actually, I'm sure it's shortening my life).
Enough.