Dubai Blue said:
The point is he thought he would be getting £440 in return, which would have been an understandable gamble. I'm sure if he actually knew he only stood to win £44 off a stake of £4,400 even this window licker would have abstained. It's an idiotic bet for such little value and simply not worth the risk, no matter how miniscule it might be.
I didn't pick up on this but I think you're right, ehehe.
Still, the number of times a team who has let in four goals with a dozen minutes left to play plus injury time is going to score four goals themselves and not concede another is a pretty remote possibility and in essence you're pocketing (or expect to pocket) 44 quid for risking 4,400 pounds for 1/6 of an hour, which implies a 6% return on your money over 60 minutes. It was a good bet even at these odds, but admittedly he thought he saw buried treasure and was taking 440 quid for his trouble (he was rashly stupid, but his actual actions were still merited from a professional's standpoint in my opinion).
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.okcupid.com/tests/the-professional-gambler-aptitude-test" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.okcupid.com/tests/the-profes ... itude-test</a>
- the above link is for anyone who wants to test their gambling smarts; written by a pro.