johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
Re: Adam Johnson
I've seen £18m and £14m quoted as well but I agree with your point, if it's £10m it looks like another piece of really inept business, let's hope not.LongsightM13 said:Did we really only get £10m for Adam Johnson? And handed a chunk of it back to him in a lump sum? While Sunderland paid £14m for a relegated donkey like Fletcher? And Wolves also got £10m-plus for Jarvis? Only a year after Liverpool paid Sunderland £18m for a borderline championship standard player like Henderson?
Am I the only one who sees something wrong with this picture?
Who the hell is doing these deals? Weiss and Johnson gone for a combined £11.4m, less pay-offs.
Terrible, terrible business. Even fucking Wolves and Jez fucking Moxey are making us look like mugs.
Fuck me, some things never change at City. Buy high, sell low. It's in our DNA. From Malcolm's disastrous second coming to Clive Wilson, Trevor Francis, Anelka and Sturridge, we have always been a soft touch.
If we ever sold Vinnie, we would probably lose money on him. Jesus fucking wept.