Aguero banned for three games (updated)

Whilst not in the same league as Ben Thatcher's it's still an action of malice.

Then again Fellaini gets away with elbowing incidents every single game so it's nothing out of the ordinary over there.
 
Perhaps the time has come when a club actually takes a ref to court, and sues him for making a arguably wrong decision. If the ref then has to pay that club a large amount of damages to that club, perhaps then the FA might do something about it. The incident with SA can plainly be seen by the ref, he makes the movement to play on, so therefore the FA should not be forcing the ref to change his mind, be reversing his decision. This change of heart by the ref was only brought about by the amount of TV coverage by all the broadcasters and nobody else. Would they have made such a fuss if it had been Wanye Rooney you can stake your house on it they would have tried to keep it as quite as possible.

Get use to it guys the whole of broadcasting and the authorities that govern football are totally corrupt, and until there is a total clear out of all those that govern football it will always be the same.


Not a hope in hell will this happen
 
Winston Reid must have been having flashbacks to the Aguero incident on Saturday, can be the only reason for West Ham's capitulation.
 
Do the 'independent' commission usually make the reasoning behind their decisions public? Sky Sports News are running details of the findings as a precursor to tonight's CL game. Apparently the 3 match ban was handed out because of the "brutal" nature of the incident and Sergio actions were in an "aggressive manner, excessive in force and brutal". I strand corrected if it's normal policy to publish their findings but I don't recall seeing it before.
 

Good case for a red and at least a yellow. Same basically as the Kun incident. Some refs give em some don't. The real stink is how the authorities decide who gets investigated and how they then set about manipulating the outcomes.
 
Do the 'independent' commission usually make the reasoning behind their decisions public? Sky Sports News are running details of the findings as a precursor to tonight's CL game. Apparently the 3 match ban was handed out because of the "brutal" nature of the incident and Sergio actions were in an "aggressive manner, excessive in force and brutal". I strand corrected if it's normal policy to publish their findings but I don't recall seeing it before.

Ive also asked the question mate as i believe this is nothing more than a character assassination and a stitch up.

Its also almost word for word, "clenched fist" etc etc for what Sky ran with almost immediately after the game so no coincidence there then eh?
 
Do the 'independent' commission usually make the reasoning behind their decisions public? Sky Sports News are running details of the findings as a precursor to tonight's CL game. Apparently the 3 match ban was handed out because of the "brutal" nature of the incident and Sergio actions were in an "aggressive manner, excessive in force and brutal". I strand corrected if it's normal policy to publish their findings but I don't recall seeing it before.
Sky are on a mission to ruin us any which way,i'm sure sergio won't be affected one bit
 
you know what i think the Aguero 3 match ban has give us a big lift and will bring the players even more together
the dirty tricks in the media and we all know who runs it has come back to bite them and we are now not a 1 man team we have power to hurt anybody and we still have the new lads yet to play and a young lad coming in at christmas that could be a superstar so let them try the dirty ticks. but i think pep and manchester city are now a club and yes we still need time to gel and build but sorry united and jose and skysports and bbc MANCHESTER CITY HAVE DONE IT THEIR WAY WITHOUT ANY HELP FROM YOU and when you come asking for something FUCK OFF
 
Based on the commissioners judgement on what constitutes as 'excessive force', we'd have retrospective bans in every game. It's a complete farce that aguero's challenge (which didn't even make contact) is highlighted as some sort of negligent act, whilst we see these types of incidents week in and week out with other clubs that go unnoticed because it didn't fit the narrative of the media.
 
Ive also asked the question mate as i believe this is nothing more than a character assassination and a stitch up.

Its also almost word for word, "clenched fist" etc etc for what Sky ran with almost immediately after the game so no coincidence there then eh?

I genuinely do my best to stay away from the conspiracy theories, not necessarily because I don't believe them, more that it won't do my health any good buying into them, but at times it's impossible not to feel as though someone's taking the piss. There must have been some well pissed off people at 2.20 on Saturday afternoon, which is what makes me feel a whole lot better!
 
Do the 'independent' commission usually make the reasoning behind their decisions public? Sky Sports News are running details of the findings as a precursor to tonight's CL game. Apparently the 3 match ban was handed out because of the "brutal" nature of the incident and Sergio actions were in an "aggressive manner, excessive in force and brutal". I strand corrected if it's normal policy to publish their findings but I don't recall seeing it before.
First time Ive ever seen it..a bit similar to the "new rule enforced when owen scored that winner , I have never seen a ref add time in added time for "over " celebrating a goal since
 
So, if the Aguero incident was"brutal " I presume all the incidents from the Derby will be looked at with the same scrutiny?
Zlatan on Otomendi, and Felaini knocking out Kolarov's tooth for example?
Naah! Don't be silly, they were totally fair!!!.....
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top