Ajay - just seen you post. What's your take...

[foreverblue]

i find it so amusing if you look back at is posts there are no facts that can be proven all speculation, yet ther are still believers

Why does it bother you so much?

I'd like to here what Ajay has to say about the days events, jus a shame he's been harrassed so much that it's not worth his while posting his thoughts as much.

And while he may or may not be ITK, and while he may or may not talk in facts or speculation his posts were a damn sight more interesting than many.

Actually I agree with you here. I haven't a clue if he Ajay was ITK, but just because a transfer doesn't come off doesn't mean that the guy wasn't telling the truth.

 

[forevermancity]

Look the guy knows fuck all, stop pandering to his ego by asking him questions and letting him know some idiots out there still think he has tea every night with the owners of our club

whats it got to do with you? he wants ajays thoughts. why does that wind you up?

 

[magoo]

if you dont want facts but want "interesting" posts I suggest you buy a book.
Ajay claimed to know things that he clearly didnt, at least tfm was committed to his bull..
if you like fiction read a book if you want sensible debate and genuine info about man city then lets post on one of the forums. :)

 

[forevermancity]

if you dont want facts but want "interesting" posts I suggest you buy a book.
Ajay claimed to know things that he clearly didnt, at least tfm was committed to his bull..
if you like fiction read a book if you want sensible debate and genuine info about man city then lets post on one of the forums. :)

how about:

if you dont want to hear ajays info/views, DONT OPEN A THREAD CALLED 'AJAY, WHATS YOU TAKE'

NOT FUCKING ROCKET SCIENCE IS IT

 

[magoo]

if you dont want facts but want "interesting" posts I suggest you buy a book.
Ajay claimed to know things that he clearly didnt, at least tfm was committed to his bull..
if you like fiction read a book if you want sensible debate and genuine info about man city then lets post on one of the forums. :)

how about:

if you dont want to hear ajays info/views, DONT OPEN A THREAD CALLED 'AJAY, WHATS YOU TAKE'

NOT FUCKING ROCKET SCIENCE IS IT[/quote

COULDNT AGREE MORE>>> BEST ADDRESS THE POSTER SCIENTIST

 

[bluemoon05]

Actually I agree with you here. I haven't a clue if he Ajay was ITK, but just because a transfer doesn't come off doesn't mean that the guy wasn't telling the truth.

Ajay practically said Villa was nailed on and when the whole Kaka thing happened he latched on to that saying it was nailed on. He was just chatting complete shit basically.

 

[S04]

if you dont want facts but want "interesting" posts I suggest you buy a book.
Ajay claimed to know things that he clearly didnt, at least tfm was committed to his bull..
if you like fiction read a book if you want sensible debate and genuine info about man city then lets post on one of the forums. :)

Since when do we say Man City on here?..

 

[S04]

Actually I agree with you here. I haven't a clue if he Ajay was ITK, but just because a transfer doesn't come off doesn't mean that the guy wasn't telling the truth.

Ajay practically said Villa was nailed on and when the whole Kaka thing happened he latched on to that saying it was nailed on. He was just chatting complete shit basically.

He also said that Bellamy was our back-up striker if we failed to sign a big name striker so the verdict is not conclusive...

Ajays problem was that people read what they wanted to hear in his posts, or maybe it was their problem perhaps. I for one enjoyed reading them.
It´s hardly very different from what we heard from Anil Bhoyrul, I think I´ve tracked down Anils "source" by the way..It was our old friend Dr Al-Fahim most likely.

 

[Timbobs]

Actually I agree with you here. I haven't a clue if he Ajay was ITK, but just because a transfer doesn't come off doesn't mean that the guy wasn't telling the truth.

Ajay practically said Villa was nailed on and when the whole Kaka thing happened he latched on to that saying it was nailed on. He was just chatting complete shit basically.

He also said that Bellamy was our back-up striker if we failed to sign a big name striker so the verdict is not conclusive...

Ajays problem was that people read what they wanted to hear in his posts, or maybe it was their problem perhaps. I for one enjoyed reading them.
It´s hardly very different from what we heard from Anil Bhoyrul, I think I´ve tracked down Anils "source" by the way..It was our old friend Dr Al-Fahim most likely.

I'm not in Ajay is a ITK or not camp, i'm agnostic on the whole Ajay subject, but Bellamy himself said that he knew he wasn't going to be 1st choice striker, so he may have got the information from the interview.

 

[bluemoon05]

[
He also said that Bellamy was our back-up striker if we failed to sign a big name striker so the verdict is not conclusive...

Ajays problem was that people read what they wanted to hear in his posts, or maybe it was their problem perhaps. I for one enjoyed reading them.
It´s hardly very different from what we heard from Anil Bhoyrul, I think I´ve tracked down Anils "source" by the way..It was our old friend Dr Al-Fahim most likely.

I enjoyed reading Ajay's posts as much as the next man for entertainment value but he was in now way ITK.