Can't think what the problem may be, as today's story in the Guardian highlights.
Commons public accounts committee issues damning report into £777m of contracts given to firm that employed Owen Paterson as lobbyist
www.theguardian.com
Ministers and government officials played “fast and loose” when awarding £777m in Covid contracts to a healthcare firm that employed the Conservative MP Owen Paterson as a lobbyist, the head of parliament’s spending watchdog has said.
In a damning report, the House of Commons public accounts committee (PAC) concluded that the government made a series of failures, making it impossible to know if the contracts had been awarded properly to Randox.
The Department of Health and Social Care did little to deal with potential conflicts of interests despite “clear concerns” about Randox’s political connections, the cross-party committee of MPs found.
It added that officials were aware Paterson had been in direct contact with Matt Hancock, who was then the health secretary, while promoting Randox.
The MPs found that Randox made “substantial” profits after it was given the contracts to carry out Covid testing during the pandemic.
The firm’s profits in the year to June 2021 were “more than 100 times greater” than the previous year, according to the PAC, which questioned whether they were excessive.
In its latest accounts, Randox reported a profit of £177m for the year to 30 June 2021. The MPs said this compared with a profit of £1.2m that Randox reported for the 18 months up to 30 June 2020.
In case anybody has forgotten, Owen Paterson was the MP employed by Randox for £100k/year when Boris tried to change the rules to avoid him being sacked. I am confident that Boris,
as far as he was aware, did not enjoy any monies or benefits by him or any of his ministers passed on being directly connected with this good fortune for Randox and believed that they were purely coincidental.
The Parliamentary Standards Commissioner report - said Paterson had "repeatedly used his privileged position to benefit two companies for whom he was a paid consultant, and that this has brought the house into disrepute" and that "no previous case of paid advocacy has seen so many breaches or such a clear pattern of behaviour in failing to separate private and public interests".
Small tip of the huge iceberg.