American Woman accuses Cristiano Ronaldo of Rape.

oldtimerdiscopants

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
1,619
Especially in the US where there are no reporting restrictions around a court case. The media are free to speculate as much as they wish.

I do prefer our system on that.


I have noticed that the left and right wing press over in the states muddy the water a lot.
 

kaz7

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
128,144
Location
Plugging my brain in
This would be the logical thing to do. But we live in the world full of nosey bastards. These stories should only be made publi****il a verdict is given. No one knows what happened between Ronaldo and this woman. By the sound of things though, Ronaldo does seem guilty.

The same couldn’t be said about Ched Evans. The girl who stitched him up should’ve done some time.
How many more times,the girl never accused him of rape,she said she couldn't remember what happened,the police took it foward and he was charged with rape,lets not turn this into the chad thread,the cases could not be more different
 

kinkladze10

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 Sep 2008
Messages
536
Location
Heywood
How many more times,the girl never accused him of rape,she said she couldn't remember what happened,the police took it foward and he was charged with rape,lets not turn this into the chad thread,the cases could not be more different

Well stop banging on about it then, if you don’t like it.

Yes, your’re right the once victim never accused Chad of rape: However, she made an allagation that her drink was spiked because she had no memory of the night before, so as she could not confirm consent, rape must have occurred. Why else was it reported to the police.

The Chad case have used purely due to the fact that because just because an allagation has been made, does not mean the accused is guilty.
 

worsleyweb

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 Sep 2009
Messages
29,218
Location
Manchester
I am holding judgment on the Ronaldo one but the dr women in the us senate who was going on about an attempted rape 36 years ago was in my strong opinion acting.
 

kaz7

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
128,144
Location
Plugging my brain in
Well stop banging on about it then, if you don’t like it.

Yes, your’re right the once victim never accused Chad of rape: However, she made an allagation that her drink was spiked because she had no memory of the night before, so as she could not confirm consent, rape must have occurred. Why else was it reported to the police.

The Chad case have used purely due to the fact that because just because an allagation has been made, does not mean the accused is guilty.
Squirty took this into the chad case,i just answered him,she never accused him of rape and that is the misconception,there is loads of sexual assault definations that come under that unmbrella term,she thought she was spiked and had no memory of what happened and was right to go to the police as should anyone who feels they have been spiked

Before i get another thread ban i'm out on the Evans case

This case is different as the women has accused him,a rape kit and statements were taken she just refused to name him,i wouldn't have taken on a rich famous man back there either,i am not coming down on one side or the other as i have not read enough of the details and he hasn't been charged
 

worsleyweb

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 Sep 2009
Messages
29,218
Location
Manchester
Squirty took this into the chad case,i just answered him,she never accused him of rape and that is the misconception,there is loads of sexual assault definations that come under that unmbrella term,she thought she was spiked and had no memory of what happened and was right to go to the police as should anyone who feels they have been spiked

Before i get another thread ban i'm out on the Evans case

This case is different as the women has accused him,a rape kit and statements were taken she just refused to name him,i wouldn't have taken on a rich famous man back there either,i am not coming down on one side or the other as i have not read enough of the details and he hasn't been charged


Problem is Karen in this day and age and as we saw with the Roxanne pallet case some women do make things up. Not saying this women is or is not. Let the law take its due course. I am a strong believer that in rape cases the accused should not be named. Let’s just say for now that Ronaldo is not guilty. He is still tainted forever guilty or not.
 

kaz7

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
128,144
Location
Plugging my brain in
Problem is Karen in this day and age and as we saw with the Roxanne pallet case some women do make things up. Not saying this women is or is not. Let the law take its due course. I am a strong believer that in rape cases the accused should not be named. Let’s just say for now that Ronaldo is not guilty. He is still tainted forever guilty or not.
I totally agree naming people is wrong,in this case there has been a civiil case and maybe thats why it's out there already,i'm not sure with the internet it's possible to keep things a secret ,even with injunctions it's gets out on the web somehow,i suspect the number of people that make things up is not big enough to warrant a change in the law
 

argyle

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 Jan 2009
Messages
11,103
This would be the logical thing to do. But we live in the world full of nosey bastards. These stories should only be made publi****il a verdict is given. No one knows what happened between Ronaldo and this woman. By the sound of things though, Ronaldo does seem guilty.

The same couldn’t be said about Ched Evans. The girl who stitched him up should’ve done some time.

As I said last night, the police and cps release the name of the alleged attacker in case there are other victims who can come forward.

That girl was also the victim of malicious attacks from Ched's supporters.
 

Manchester_lalala

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 Jul 2008
Messages
18,705
Problem is Karen in this day and age and as we saw with the Roxanne pallet case some women do make things up. Not saying this women is or is not. Let the law take its due course. I am a strong believer that in rape cases the accused should not be named. Let’s just say for now that Ronaldo is not guilty. He is still tainted forever guilty or not.

She definitley needs locking up. One twisted cow, solely living to ruin some blokes life.
 

Don't have an account?

Register now!
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.