Why Clichy and not Kolarov?Do you see him as a better player than Clichy a year or two from now?
I know I do. I'd like to see him playing second fiddle to Kolarov next seasonDo you see him as a better player than Clichy a year or two from now?
Why Clichy and not Kolarov?
I personally think that he could be better than both if he can improve defensively but from what I've heard Sarmiento from the under 18's looks just as promising.
For the record i prefer Clichy to Kolarov when both fully fit and on Form.
I know I do. I'd like to see him playing second fiddle to Kolarov next season
I rate Kolarov above Clichy so that's why I chose Clichy but that's irrelevant really in the discussion.
So if he would be classed as homegrown then 7M € seems very cheap
Thanks for letting me know about how highly Sarmiento is rates, I went to the Academy game v Leeds and must admit was very impressed but not seen enough of him. Wish I could devote more time to watching the EDS and Academy
You won't have seen much of him he has only been here a few months and only played a few games
And could take up Juan Bernat's role.Sarmiento's definitely not a reason to get rid of Angelino as i don't think he's shown he's a better prospect, just a similar one. I don't think Angelino will go anywhere personally. If Pep's coming then he'll hang around.
Or of course we keep both since Clichy and Kolorav both turn 31 this year. Sarmiento is only 17 and Angelino only just turned 19.Although he looks very promising if we can get a good few for him then we have Sarmiento who looks just as good if not better.
Barca have just let there under 21 captain Alex Grimaldo go to Benfica for a very low fee as he was nearing the end of his contract, Why let Grimaldo go to replace him with Angelino who is suspect defensively.