You’re right about being wrong, I’m an Englishman who lives in England.I could be wrong, as i never got a reply when i asked, but im nearly certain he lives in Ireland....
This came from conversations a long time ago...possibly about the NI situation...and it stuck with me, obvious as i live in NI
Either way, you’re still wrong.If that's true he won't need residency in his second home in Spain because he'll be guaranteed reciprocity because he lives in Ireland. Either way it's a case of I'm alright Jack.
You’re right about being wrong, I’m an Englishman who lives in England.
I don’t know what point I failed to address, and my apologies if I didn’t, but if you want to repeat it, l’ll respond.
There are soooo many posts banging on about the intent of the UK to lower food standardsThere's the knock on effects for the health service as well. Lower food standards will mean lower cost to the consumer at the til, but we're already a pretty unhealthy nation as it is, and this could contribute further to the burden on the NHS in the long term. It seems tho that the reason we won't introduce legislation on this is that it would knacker any deal with the USA.
There are soooo many posts banging on about the intent of the UK to lower food standards
Can any of you please explain why you are so adamant that a Labour government would do that?
Er.. what about all the months in Spain?amazing isn’t people on this thread telling themselves where you actually live and convincing each other they are right about where YOU live
There are soooo many posts banging on about the intent of the UK to lower food standards
Can any of you please explain why you are so adamant that a Labour government would do that?
But all those posters banging on about this are simply and clearly rambling inconsistently in their desperate need to scaremonger.I’ve seen a lot of posts speculating that food standards could fall victim to a trade deal with the US in particular but no-one knows for sure if that will happen, like the Brexit flag wavers can’t be certain it won’t.
It seems a silly question to ask why anyone is adamant a Labour government would do that when the trade deals currently and for the next few years are being negotiated by a Tory government. What was your thinking in framing that question? Might help if you point out who has made that suggestion
But all those posters banging on about this are simply and clearly rambling inconsistently in their desperate need to scaremonger.
The same posters were only recently stating clearly that the incoming US government would not do a trade deal with this current UK government - so the reality is that an FTA between the US and UK will be agreed between 2 new administrations
So no - not really a silly question is it?
Some posters are just so desperate to paint everything so negative - they cannot even spot when they are contradicting themselves.
Oh - OKWell as I understand it there was a concern in respect of the Irish border situation and the GFA where it was American politicians who were saying there would be no trade deal if the agreement was compromised and some posters quoted them. Again all ifs, buts and maybes but a potential all the same.
The reality is that whoever wins the US election it is the current Tory government that will be negotiating a trade deal with them. It is inconceivable that this would be in abeyance for three years. So, yes, it was a silly question. The best Labour can hope for is inheriting a trade deal that serves UK interests without compromising too much on those much discussed food standards or allows the US to build stakes in our health care system