Seems his sister knows the score
Time for his dad to disinherit him.
Seems his sister knows the score
Nationalise land.Great post. Economist Michael Hudson describes it as neo feudalism. That's where we are today and it's unsustainable. The question is where do we go from here.
Which is why Labour can't get elected on the votes of the Many because it's the poor who are now the Few. Many of the Many are selfish.
Nationalise land.
More like signing up for a mystery excursion then everyone on it is disappointed because it can't to the destination they thought was promised, cake and eat it island.If that's most baffling to you then ....selective myopia? Artificial unintelligence?, but joking aside ( :), guarantee we will not leave and every compromise is in play but that would negate every single brexit intention of escaping EU democracy . And off we go again on the brexit magic roundabout, same old lies same old victimhood ......tickets please, mind the gap, just needs the "We are sorry to announce the brexit excursion to lalaland has been cancelled. This is due to a shortage of passengers and credibility. Thank you for waiting your custom is important to our shareholders.
Yes! Other families must take priority over your own, you evil, selfish, fascist!What selfishness would that be exactly eh Vicky? Wanting to hang on to half the money I earn so I can support my family, meany old me? Or do you have some other "sin" in mind?
Ooh, how much land do we each get?How?
Pay full market rate for it or just take it?
Then what?
Give it to the poor? What do they do with it?
At the expense of a poorer child who is actually better at rugby or dancing or both. Justify it how you like, but don't pretend it doesn't cause harm and disadvantage to others.Is that what we all do as parents?
I pay for Rugby lessons for my lad and dancing for my girls but i dont pay for anyone elses kids do I?
They are only 8 but come the end of secondary school and exams time they will get every spare penny I have spent on them for tutors if they need them to get the required grades and again, i wont be paying for any other kids and yes it will be to give mine an advantage.
Define "selfish".Which is why Labour can't get elected on the votes of the Many because it's the poor who are now the Few. Many of the Many are selfish.
At the expense of a poorer child who is actually better at rugby or dancing or both. Justify it how you like, but don't pretend it doesn't cause harm and disadvantage to others.
It's all relative. I have more than I need to live on - but perhaps now worry more about the future than I would have done under cradle to grave welfare state. Did I buy a season ticket at City for someone else's child? No. Would I have paid more tax so all children could have extramural sport and dance and music? Yes.What selfishness would that be exactly eh Vicky? Wanting to hang on to half the money I earn so I can support my family, meany old me? Or do you have some other "sin" in mind?
Honestly I find it astonishing that even someone as deluded as you could post that. Really absolutely astonishing.At the expense of a poorer child who is actually better at rugby or dancing or both. Justify it how you like, but don't pretend it doesn't cause harm and disadvantage to others.
Sell it to the rich.How?
Pay full market rate for it or just take it?
Then what?
Give it to the poor? What do they do with it?
Cha-ching!Sell it to the rich.
So you are the absolute arbiter of what is and what is not selfish now, are you? Is that how it works?It's all relative. I have more than I need to live on - but perhaps now worry more about the future than I would have done under cradle to grave welfare state. Did I buy a season ticket at City for someone else's child? No. Would I have paid more tax so all children could have extramural sport and dance and music? Yes.
It's an inherent bias in that the poor are more transient and less likely to be registered to vote (and Tories have a track record of gerrymandering).Who, exactly are ‘the poor’. Let’s say it’s the homeless, those in temporary accommodation or the long term unemployed. I’d suggest that demographic doesn’t vote anyway so any policy designed to take their ‘benefits’ away will always get support and any in support of that demographic won’t because those in power know they won’t go to the ballot box
We 100% need an election now. Nothing can actually get sorted until we do.
Right now politics and parliament in particular are a joke. I’d get rid of all of them
It'll be all along the coast and worthless when the polar ice caps melt.Ooh, how much land do we each get?
Do we get to choose where, too?
Plenty of historic arguments for it so I'll not write a manifesto. But the Poll Tax vastly benefited the wealthy by detaching tax from occupation of land. Reversing that would be a start.How?
Pay full market rate for it or just take it?
Then what?
Give it to the poor? What do they do with it?
Yep a revised deal that alters or deals with the backstop in a meaningful way should get through but you know what mate?
It wont because despite the protestations of many in the house saying they just want to stop no deal.....its bullshit.
They want to stop brexit.