Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Conversely the previous growth in economic activity which was trumpeted by the Brexiteers as proof that Project Fear was bollocks was simply the additional manufacturing to do the stockpiling in the first place. The reality is that our GDP growth has fallen from near the top of the EU table to near the bottom since the vote.
Its a good job we don't have decent economic growth. Last time we had the temerity to do so in 2014 the EU demanded a further £1.7bn from us by the end of the year on top of the £39bn to compensate the other EU nations - a sort of success fine if you like.
 
That would get you half a days positive coverage before we switch back to the endless stream of negativity - real time stories coming out of all sectors of the economy who just can't continue and make a profit, how long do they go before they shut the factory/plant/lab/shop/farm gates...
Major food retailer this morning made it clear that "preparing for No Deal" means their financial duty is to the shareholders not the government nor the consumer, so their preparations will not be primarily aimed at keeping food on shelves (and absorbing extra warehouse costs) but sacking staff if turnover slumps or costs rise.
 
Its a good job we don't have decent economic growth. Last time we had the temerity to do so in 2014 the EU demanded a further £1.7bn from us by the end of the year on top of the £39bn to compensate the other EU nations - a sort of success fine if you like.


If only there was a membership somewhere that could allow us to have decent economic growth.
 
I think you’ll find that the 1/5th of one percent contraction is due simply to fact the companies who stockpiled previously didn’t need to resupply for the following months.
Yep. Stockpiling is all that's kept us out of recession this last year. Now it's not that they don't need to resupply, it's that there's nowhere to store the bloody stuff.
 
I’m not a socialist.
I can Google stuff myself, I’m neither too lazy to do it nor require other people to do it for me.

In that case I suggest you get other people to at least explain the articles you manage to look up. I can’t be doing it all the time.
 
I’m not a socialist.
I can Google stuff myself, I’m neither too lazy to do it nor require other people to do it for me.

That's always the most prevalent trait in socialists I find. I mean say what you want about Bevan but the guy never Googled anything in his life the lazy git
 
Major food retailer this morning made it clear that "preparing for No Deal" means their financial duty is to the shareholders not the government nor the consumer, so their preparations will not be primarily aimed at keeping food on shelves (and absorbing extra warehouse costs) but sacking staff if turnover slumps or costs rise.
Although if say Tesco are pictured with rows of empty shelves, whereas say Sainsbury’s are reasonably well stocked, that would be a massive marketing coup for Sainsbury’s.

The ability to keep shelves reasonably well stocked would surely be perceived by shoppers as being a good indicator as to how efficient that store is?
 
Although if say Tesco are pictured with rows of empty shelves, whereas say Sainsbury’s are reasonably well stocked, that would be a massive marketing coup for Sainsbury’s.

The ability to keep shelves reasonably well stocked would surely be perceived by shoppers as being a good indicator as to how efficient that store is?

Do people really think we're going to run out of food because we are leaving a trading union?

Did they stop taking cash or something?
 
Although if say Tesco are pictured with rows of empty shelves, whereas say Sainsbury’s are reasonably well stocked, that would be a massive marketing coup for Sainsbury’s.

The ability to keep shelves reasonably well stocked would surely be perceived by shoppers as being a good indicator as to how efficient that store is?
Does that explain why major food retailers want the government to suspend competition laws so they can cooperate on supplying essentials? I've not quite followed the story but sharing distribution costs between the big boys may be seen as unfair competition to new entrants.
 
Although if say Tesco are pictured with rows of empty shelves, whereas say Sainsbury’s are reasonably well stocked, that would be a massive marketing coup for Sainsbury’s.

The ability to keep shelves reasonably well stocked would surely be perceived by shoppers as being a good indicator as to how efficient that store is?

They'll have sorted their range out beforehand,some items will be dropped due to price etc.
Most shortages will be due to panic buying anyhow,sooner or later it'll normalise albeit with reduced ranges, probably.
 
Does that explain why major food retailers want the government to suspend competition laws so they can cooperate on supplying essentials? I've not quite followed the story but sharing distribution costs between the big boys may be seen as unfair competition to new entrants.

I'd argue that it's more likely that billion pound multi national corporations are attempting to exploit this panic in order to circumvent exists anti-monopoly laws rather than having some sort of deep concern for the British people and their supply of salami slices. But I'm the cynical type.
 
Major food retailer this morning made it clear that "preparing for No Deal" means their financial duty is to the shareholders not the government nor the consumer, so their preparations will not be primarily aimed at keeping food on shelves (and absorbing extra warehouse costs) but sacking staff if turnover slumps or costs rise.
Got a link?

Asking for a friend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top