mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
So is Danny.A veto is a veto.
He’s the Veto.
I’ll get me coat.
So is Danny.A veto is a veto.
Eh? Not sure how a 300nm trip can be the same as a 55nm trip whatever the water depth.Cork to France is deep water, no difference.
So what happens if he ignores one? This is a point of curiosity for me, your PM sets the agenda for parliament seemingly but our dail sets the agenda for the Taoiseach and our president has a far more active role than your queen.The supreme source of law in the UK is an Act of Parliament. He can’t defy an Act. Anything short of that, and it depends what it is.
Surely, after that, you should call a Taxi.So is Danny.
He’s the Veto.
I’ll get me coat.
Most of the time is loading and unloading these days mate. There's very little difference between Dublin to Calais and Cork to Roscoff.Eh? Not sure how a 300nm trip can be the same as a 55nm trip whatever the water depth.
That wasn't the discussion but thanks anyway. (Although the distance difference in those routes is 200 nautical miles so not sure on your point).Most of the time is loading and unloading these days mate. There's very little difference between Dublin to Calais and Cork to Roscoff.
Like remainers are obsessed with Farage?
I use Verhofstadt because he's the most vocal, and also the example of the type of Europhile I despise and the type I wish to see eradicated from the idea of "Europe". Tusk, for example, was not approving of the language Verhofstadt used in his discussions of the brexit situation. Tusk is more level headed, and he himself warned about the EU's obsession with wanting more sovereign powers, and ignoring the public.
His is not a minority view, it's growing, and if Verhofstadt's vision of Europe is one truly shared by people in Europe, it is not a "Europe" I wish to be associated with, as a citizen.
How would the GFA be affected by an EU-US trade deal?They've said the same to the EU as well, putting the scuppers on any EU-US trade deal.
200 nautical miles counter acted by how many land miles?That wasn't the discussion but thanks anyway. (Although the distance difference in those routes is 200 nautical miles so not sure on your point).
So what happens if he ignores one? This is a point of curiosity for me, your PM sets the agenda for parliament seemingly but our dail sets the agenda for the Taoiseach and our president has a far more active role than your queen.
Like remainers are obsessed with Farage?
I use Verhofstadt because he's the most vocal, and also the example of the type of Europhile I despise and the type I wish to see eradicated from the idea of "Europe". Tusk, for example, was not approving of the language Verhofstadt used in his discussions of the brexit situation. Tusk is more level headed, and he himself warned about the EU's obsession with wanting more sovereign powers, and ignoring the public.
His is not a minority view, it's growing, and if Verhofstadt's vision of Europe is one truly shared by people in Europe, it is not a "Europe" I wish to be associated with, as a citizen.
I can smell desperation in the air!
That makes no sense in the context of my earlier points and what you said about the two routes. Let's leave it at you thinking all will be hunkydory and me having a few doubts.200 nautical miles counter acted by how many land miles?
I see the unelected, unaccountable John Bolton has been promising a ‘brilliant trade deal’ following discussions with the unelected and unaccountable Dominic Cummings. Dominic is also at the forefront of doing ‘whatever it takes, including proroguing parliament if necessary, to secure a no-deal Brexit.
#takingbackcontrol.
In other news, Boris announces that he now has a ‘war-cabinet’ (made up of 6 men just like his hero Winston Churchill) and that any MPs opposed to Brexit are, in fact, “collaborators”. He doesn’t want no-deal (why not, if it’s going to be so brilliant, one may wonder?) but is now promoting the message that no deal will be the ‘fault’ of remainers, the Irish and the rest of the untrustworthy EU members. Again, why bother, if no-deal is where it’s at?
Him and his mates certainly do own the language of, and are still fascinated by, the Second World War and it’s similarity to the Brexit situation. Can’t see it myself but the comments on the bbc and mail are full of the usual pithy comments like:“it’s a pity treason doesn’t still carry the death penalty”.
How would the GFA be affected by an EU-US trade deal?
No such altruism for British citizens in Europe though, eh.And yet it was Verhofstadt who pushed forward the idea of emergency medicine and food for the UK, in the event of a no deal, to ensure in his words “European citizens are looked after”.
He’s not even close to the same level as the immigrant hating Farage.
We'll leave it at the teleportation pod between holyhead and Dover.That makes no sense in the context of my earlier points and what you said about the two routes. Let's leave it at you thinking all will be hunkydory and me having a few doubts.