Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
They should have gone for it, you're right, but Corbyn's never had to make a decision in his whole parliamentary
career, he's an obscure bottle chucker from the back benches. He's still at it now, there has never been a positive move
from him since he got his scrawny arse installed as leader, courtesy of Miliband's £3 a pop membership stunt.
If there were two Corbyns, and one Corbyn was in power, the other would still vote against the other Corbyn. It's just who he is.
 
I thought we were getting rid of red-tape? Owen Paterson what’s to negotiate fishing policy on an annual basis. That will leave very little time for actual fishing.

But I suppose it’s something.....
 
They were hoping that the Supreme Court ruling would hurt the Tories opinion poll rating, it went up. They were hoping that forcing an extension request would hurt the Tories opinion poll rating, it's gone up again. If they're pinning their hopes on us not leaving on 31st October, they're sadly mistaken. Boris is playing them like a cheap fiddle, the public know he's doing his best to leave on time, and they know who is to blame if we don't.
The problem they have is that they've realised what you're saying, they've seen Johnson's ratings improve, but they
now have to keep up the blocking process, which means his standing goes even higher. Their biggest mistake, apart
from Corbyn, who is proving to be as popular as genital warts, was trying to frustrate Brexit as a means to oust the Tories,
that stance just won't work now, but they can't change tack.
Voting against everything, in full Jezza tradition, is not how you get to win friends and influence people.
 
If you think Corbyn's antics on this are being welcomed, it certainly doesn't look like it, plus as above, the Lisbon treaty passed in 5 days.
As you so rightly say, people aren't stupid.
Why do you liars do it? The bill re Lisbon was 6 months going through Parliament.
 
Last edited:
If you think Corbyn's antics on this are being welcomed, it certainly doesn't look like it, plus as above, the Lisbon treaty passed in 5 days.
As you so rightly say, people aren't stupid.

The Maastrict passed in 23 days and this is a far bigger piece of legislation this hasn't passed anything yet don't count your chickens
 
Because once it’s through the next stage is trade negotiations and both parties have said the idea of this WA and process will be to move onto a FTA, which will happen in the background.

I imagine when this has reached a certain point and it’s signed off we’ll have a General Election based on ‘normal policies’. This will likely all be done, with a new parliament, by 2021.

If we this deal doesn’t go through then we’ll likely still be in this position, with no WA, in 2021.

Apologies for the Tweet (not really ;)) It would take me too long to type it all out but it seems things are not quite so simple as you envisage.

Plus the are too many people negatively affected and enraged by Brexit for the issue to go quietly away. For example the 1.3 million Brits who live in EU countries many of whom may be forced to return. 6+ million people signed a petition to Revoke Art 50. 2 demonstrations in London have attracted a total somewhere between 1 & 3 million people, depending on whose estimate you take. Every year more young voters will be denied the freedoms we have all enjoyed for 40 years. That's all before the negative economic effect which will see public services slashed further and the poorer end of society cast further adrift. No I don't believe this is going away anytime soon.

On a more cynical note why would a political party not tap into this depth of feeling ? The LibDems are much derided on here but they have been smart and are reaping the rewards.

You need to read the whole thread

 
This exchange in the HoC is a fair reflection of where we are at:-

Owen Paterson, Tory MP for North Shropshire, asks for a “categorical assurance” that we will not use our fish stocks as a bargaining chip in future negotiations.

“I can confirm that we will take back 100% control of the spectacular marine wealth of this country,” says Johnson.

Translation - Ultra right wing Tory asks BoJo to commit to a negotiating line that they all know will be abandoned. A favorite topic of the right-wing press but of virtually no strategic value to our economy.

BoJo's response is completely meaningless - neither an answer to the question or adding anything to the debate. Totally pointless, pathetic.
 
Why do you liars do it? The bill re Lisbon was 6 months
Monkey see monkey do, then straight onto follow my leader boris says "do this" ring o'roses then the wheels on the bus have fallen off, all fall down ..
 
The Maastrict passed in 23 days and this is a far bigger piece of legislation this hasn't passed anything yet don't count your chickens
Oh, I'm not, as I've said, parliament, ie labour, will reject it, we all know, because they've said so, Corbyn said so
5 minutes after Johnson said he'd got a deal.
It's the consequence of this rejection that has been discussed, I'm under no illusions about parliament, it's the aftermath
that gets interesting, Corbyn could not possibly turn down another GE request, although knowing him it wouldn't surprise
anyone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top