Gaylord du Bois said:you've obviously played a bit.hilts said:cookster said:Fucking drama queen!
he has a point though footballers aren't the brightest sometimes
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:Pride_In_Battle said:80s Shorts said:Now we can go on and win it. Only four points behind.
Eh? Rags won, still 7 :\
After Dean's red for Vinny the FA have funded part of the appeal by giving us six points for that win!
We normally struggle at? When's the last time we won there in the league again?Ray78 said:Blue Tooth said:Sense Bobby was a bit disappointed with our second half showing...said we were too soft. I wonder if he means not ruthless enough.
Yep we are a little sloppy in our finishing, but other than that it was a satisfactory performance against a side we normally struggle at.
abu13 said:Skashion said:People who don't know the rules think it's three. It's actually one.MonsallBlue said:Why do we think its a 3 game ban?
Surely it wasnt violent conduct?
Thought it was 1 game?
Oh, by the way, well deserved win where we twatted them. Seeing good chances spurned is disappointing but we were easily worth a two goal victory.
So what did the fer send him off for then? i assumed he gave a straight red as he deemed it to be violent conduct.
Kompany was shown a straight red for his challenge on Jack Wilshere after 76 minutes and now faces a three-match ban as a result, but the City boss believes referee Mike Dean got the decision wrong.
Skashion said:People who don't know the rules think it's three. It's actually one.MonsallBlue said:Why do we think its a 3 game ban?
Surely it wasnt violent conduct?
Thought it was 1 game?
Oh, by the way, well deserved win where we twatted them. Seeing good chances spurned is disappointing but we were easily worth a two goal victory.
I thought for a professional foul which is one match, but it was serious foul play which is three. So I was wrong there. It wasn't violent conduct which is an off the ball incident.abu13 said:So what did the fer send him off for then? i assumed he gave a straight red as he deemed it to be violent conduct.
bollocksCaveman said:I can clearly see why it was a red card from the angle closest to what the ref's view of it was. I have no problems with the decision. From that angle it looked a dangerous tackle.blueinsa said:Hate doing this but any fooker saying that was a red card is a Rag!
Not only are they Rags, they are fooking no nothing Rags who have never kicked a ball in their lives.
Red card my fooking arse!
From the other angles you can clearly see that it was a good tackle. It should be rescinded. But surely you have the knowledge of the rules, history of what refs send players off for and that one view to see why he was sent off?
No.ElanJo said:Straight red = 3 games
2 Yellows = 1 game
no?
LoveCity said:Mancini not happy again at how many chances we blew and calling the strikers soft. Not important in a game like today's but like Chelsea and West Ham away, lack of ruthlessness should have turned 1pt into 3pts.
blueinsa said:Blue Tooth said:Sense Bobby was a bit disappointed with our second half showing...said we were too soft. I wonder if he means not ruthless enough.
today was a real statement from the gaffer and the squad and regardless of how the season pans out, if we keep on playing as we are, i will be a happy blue and im sure, most others will be.