BBC BS

B B

Bunk

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 Jan 2009
Messages
722
First we had "Are City doing a Newcastle", then we had "All the City fans are coming out of the woodwork" by Ferdinand and now we have "Ferguson takes no nonsense" by Bryan Robson, a clear dig at City for opening the door to Tevez. ALL of them sustained front page pieces.

What's going on at the BBC? I've always thought of the BBC to represent sound, impartial and subjective reporting but what's with all the anti-City articles? It's like one after the other.

Phil NcNulty's article is the only pro-City piece I've seen in recent weeks and even that one was gone from the front page less than 24hrs after it was put live.

It's kind of... well... a bit fucking gay really.
 
Bunk said:
What's going on at the BBC? I've always thought of the BBC to represent sound, impartial and subjective reporting
Click to expand...

Have you been hiding in the 1950s ?

Welcome to 2012, where the Beeb have an agenda on EVERY subject. They are the least impartial news reporters in the country (well, the guardian may just beat them).
 
If it was politics they would have to print a counter balance arguement which with City the won't!

Also Manure players are media whores, Wio thinks he speak for the people!!!!
 
It's like when Spurs were having a couple of good months. The phrase heard most often on the BBC was how they were playing "the most attractive and productive football this season". Since they were third at the time and twenty goals behind City, i find it hard to understand these comments. They've now decided Spur's recent poor form is down to Arry being muted for the England job, and how this is effecting the players. I was under the impression he has been muted for the England job for a few years. The love affair with "Arry i use tic tacs not tactics" continues. Hansons recent comments on City have been ridiculous.

Mancini stated early on in the Tevez saga that he would accept him back if he apologised to him and the other players. This has now happened, and Mancini is just trying to make a bad situation a little easier. It helps us now, and will help move him on come the summer for a better price.
The BBCs slant is that this shows a weakness in Mancini, and a desperate act too boost City's title race.
If this was fergie and United, it would have an entirely different slant. It would be how fergie has made Tevez return with his tail between his legs, and has shown him who is boss. Not selling him for peanuts would have also proved how strong fergie and United are.

I've not heard a single comment against fergie from the BBC. He should have been ripped apart for failing to buy a suitable replacement for Paul Scholes. Even the fact he had to bring him back out of retirement didn't generate a single negative comment. If Mancini had to go digging around City's graveyard, he would have been slaughtered for his lack of foresight...
 
Bunk said:
First we had "Are City doing a Newcastle", then we had "All the City fans are coming out of the woodwork" by Ferdinand and now we have "Ferguson takes no nonsense" by Bryan Robson, a clear dig at City for opening the door to Tevez. ALL of them sustained front page pieces.

What's going on at the BBC? I've always thought of the BBC to represent sound, impartial and subjective reporting but what's with all the anti-City articles? It's like one after the other.

Phil NcNulty's article is the only pro-City piece I've seen in recent weeks and even that one was gone from the front page less than 24hrs after it was put live.

It's kind of... well... a bit fucking gay really.
Click to expand...

"Ferguson takes no nonsense" ?????????????????????????????

Except of course when Rooney throws a wobbler threatens to leave and so doubles his wages..
 
Have you been hiding in the 1950s ?

Welcome to 2012, where the Beeb have an agenda on EVERY subject. They are the least impartial news reporters in the country (well, the guardian may just beat them).[/quote]

one step beyond credibility, in fact a light year beyond a joke, take a bow for the silliest post ever. Talk about an agenda
 
Nothing the BBC does suprises me, muppets are so indequate they had to give the F1 coverge to sky because they realised they couldnt afford to pay for it.

They then plastered the front page with results of qualifying and then the race early sat and sun in a bitter small minded attempt to upstage the sky coverage.

Added to that most of the editorial staff are barely literate and their live football txt update continually posts granny shagger and camel gob tweets...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.