Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,340
The BBC is not completely publicly funded, they are partly self-funding. So for instance BBC programmes are sold around the world and that all goes into the corporation's coffers. BBC programmes are sold to subscription channels (think Blackadder repeats being run on Dave,) Then there are profits from advertising (eg BBC America) and so on. So the BBC is already part-funded by advertising.A bit off topic but as the BBC are publicly funded why do they need to chase click-bait? There's no advertising that they are chasing for revenue.
If sports on the BBC were part funded by sponsors at least when it say "This website/ programme is sponsored by MUTV or LFCTV" their behaviour would be more understandable.
BTW I'm personally ok with the BBC being funded by a license (as per my previous post), but believe some elements could be part funded by limited advertising.
You can actually see this in the programmes they make. In lifestyle programmes screened on the BBC itself, for instance, about 15 minutes in to the programm there sort of comes a natural break, and then you have an establishing shot of the Devon countryside before the presenter has a sort of recap. You know the thing. 'Mike and Andrea have decided to swap their life in the suburbs for a smallholding on Dartmoor.' Why does this mid-program recap appear in a BBC production? Because that recap will follow an advert break when the program is repeated on channels that carry advertising.
It is in this context that the Beeb chase clicks like everyone else. If you access the BBC website from abroad, you get adverts. Those adverts generate revenue for the corporation. Clickbait works for them just as it works for everyone else.