Birmingham...Revenge is a dish best served cold !

[salfordtrueblue]

Lets start using our financial muscle a bit more wisely,we are after all the financial superpower of the premiership... ie, If we sneeze the rest of the league catch a cold !!!!!!!

 

[wrongun73]

we just need to make them have to buy another keeper that wont be in the same class as hart, simple, that and twat 'em again next season!!

 

[dom]

Hang on . I thought that it was the FA that vetoed us , not Brum, who seemed to be disposed to negotations

 

[salfordtrueblue]

Hang on . I thought that it was the FA that vetoed us , not Brum, who seemed to be disposed to negotations

Originally City wanted to bring Hart back from his loan spell, but were already struggling to conclude a deal with Birmingham because, after offering to waive a loan fee of £460,000, pick up Hart's £30,000-a-week wages and settle outstanding agents' fees, they were shocked to hear how much Birmingham wanted in return for the player.

 

[hello]

Hang on . I thought that it was the FA that vetoed us , not Brum, who seemed to be disposed to negotations

Originally City wanted to bring Hart back from his loan spell, but were already struggling to conclude a deal with Birmingham because, after offering to waive a loan fee of £460,000, pick up Hart's £30,000-a-week wages and settle outstanding agents' fees, they were shocked to hear how much Birmingham wanted in return for the player.

That would essentially be £750k a game for Birmingham to have Hart play the last 2 games with the highest possible finish worth 3m more than the lowest possible, are they really that shit without him or is that one hell of a gamble.

Come on Burnley

 

[Challenger1978]

Hang on . I thought that it was the FA that vetoed us , not Brum, who seemed to be disposed to negotations

Originally City wanted to bring Hart back from his loan spell, but were already struggling to conclude a deal with Birmingham because, after offering to waive a loan fee of £460,000, pick up Hart's £30,000-a-week wages and settle outstanding agents' fees, they were shocked to hear how much Birmingham wanted in return for the player.

Well thats Everton and Birmingham that don't get to loan players anymore then the twats.

 

[dref619]

theyv been utter twats with this, wether we loaned him for the season or not, i cudnt give a fuck, they bang on about how they want him next season, yet go out of their way to shat on us

 

[1970IrlamBlue]

We should never allow any our our players to go there again on loan. The same applies to Everton. But we should also never have agreed to a loan deal with no emergency clause in it. Joe will be back as City's number 1 at the start of next season and Brum fans better get used of the idea!

 

[maccistani]

Dam right, I think that Mcleish thinks he owns Joe Hart or something, with the way he speaks in the press.

City couldn't recall him, but Brum could quite easily have terminated his loan contract, with or without the say so of city, the PL, Uncle Tom Cobley or whoever.

It looks like they could be joining the Portsmouth club next year with all the bank disputes there having, so city would be mad to send any player there, and hopefully, the other teams will take note too. If they had any realistic hope of being able to sign a good keeper next season, they would have released him straight away, but it seems that they are trying to brainwash him to stay there, and now their toys have come out of the pram.

Joe Hart had an amazing opportunity to take over Given, who is no spring chicken, and, In my opinion, could be out for 6 months+ with the injury, and could have shown RM and the team what he can do, so he could have cemented his place for next year.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Hang on . I thought that it was the FA that vetoed us , not Brum, who seemed to be disposed to negotations

From what I have seen and read, the 'negotiations' amounted to robbing us blind for buying back our own player!