A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Was utterly shite(along with Richards) in the derby but has looked pretty solid since.
fbloke said:I never thought I would be unhappy with it when City have Englands' second choice left back and I feel short changed.
I don't measure a player by what was paid for him, so it matters not a jot to me about Bridge's price or wage but I don't think he's good enough.
He is uni-pedal in the extreme and has yet to convince me he is fully effective either going forward or defending.
I think exactly the same about Liverpool's Johnson but he seems to be more effective going forward.
If I were MH I would certainly be on the look out for a replacement for Bridge, ideally one who can use both feet.
Looking at the way that City will be playing it is essential that whoever plays in the position has a lot of pace as we are going to pushing on a lot which will leave us open to the counter.
And before you ask, no I dont have any suggestions as to who the incomer should be.
SWPISHOME said:When Sylvinho plays Sunday he will stay there, cant believe he didnt get a game for us yet!
Wrighty Wrexham said:SWPISHOME said:When Sylvinho plays Sunday he will stay there, cant believe he didnt get a game for us yet!
Would like to see Sylvinho play for City if he does not get the chance on Sunday hope he is given a game against Scunthrope!
My failure to understand the OP combined with my consequent failure to understand the majority of responses makes me think I am out of touch with the real world (where Bridge is injured)Weston Blue said:I think Bridge has looked lively for City and I was at Wembley last night and thought he looked good for England. He has benefitted from playing regularly and having some support. I also flet he has built a resonable understanding with barry whihc came to the fore at Wembley. So disagree with OP.