Capello Index

[leighton]

Just seen the Capello Index and it doesnt read too good for most of the England squad so what does this mean for that Capello squad. How manny of those players will be in the England squad for the European quailifers in September.
Out of our players who went Barry got a rating of 57.50 whiles SWP got a rating of 61.09. The top scorer was Defoe on 62.47. Barry was the worst ranked player in the rankings who started games only Joe Cole got less than Barry with 55.45.

Below is the story and ratings.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/football/world-cup-2010/story/0,27032,12016_6267203,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/football/world ... 03,00.html</a>

 

[laserblue]

de jong got into capello's team of the world cup based on his ratings.

 

[lionheart]

Despite the Guardian reporter saying it was John Terry, SWP was actually the second best rated England player, after Defoe. No offence to SWP but was Capello watching the same tournament as the rest of us?

 

[Sabster]

Despite the Guardian reporter saying it was John Terry, SWP was actually the second best rated England player, after Defoe. No offence to SWP but was Capello watching the same tournament as the rest of us?

FFS, its done by a computer not by capello

 

[dw7]

de jong the only prem player to get into his team of the wc

 

[city diehard]

that thing is a load of old tosh!

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

that thing is a load of old tosh!

Makes more sense if the marks were out of a 1000 and not a 100!

 

[leewill31]

Just seen the Capello Index and it doesnt read too good for most of the England squad so what does this mean for that Capello squad. How manny of those players will be in the England squad for the European quailifers in September.
Out of our players who went Barry got a rating of 57.50 whiles SWP got a rating of 61.09. The top scorer was Defoe on 62.47. Barry was the worst ranked player in the rankings who started games only Joe Cole got less than Barry with 55.45.

Below is the story and ratings.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/football/world-cup-2010/story/0,27032,12016_6267203,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/football/world ... 03,00.html</a>

so this has nothing to do with capello but you yet again having a go at barry!

 

[Anonymous]

Dont see what the hoohaa is all about?

We all know England had a shocker ....... so its expected that the rating would be crap.

Its a joke if people think Capello is sitting down and watching all these players and rating them himself. He's just put his name to it, got dolla for it and thats all he'll do for it.

Anyone who thinks that its detremental for the players by rating every aspect of their performances ... i have one word for them .... OPTA. Thats been running for years, analysing every pass, tackle, shots, running distance etc. The CapelloIndex is nothing new and everyone is just jumping on it cos England had a shocking WC.

I couldn't be arsed who rates players in a game. If i see a player playing crap, he's playing crap. if he's playing good, he's playing good. Thats all i care about.

 

[stumpy_mcfc]

I will assume this has nothing to do with Capello but interesting that Hesky got such a high score :-)