SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
If UEFA choose to not let full details become public will the media assume they had a weak case?
Restricting people in this way feels to me as the Americans would say “unconstitutional” there’s just something at its very essence that sounds wrong. That’s before you take into consideration that established clubs looking out for their own interests Find it financially unbearable . It’s just wrong at it’s very core imo
Wasn’t there some nifty trick to get past a paywall?
CAS, in fact there was a case ruled on just recently in the Turkish league regarding reinstating points deducted by the Turkish FA.Now the cartel have failed to fuck us via UEFA it looks like they are now pinning their hopes on the Premier League shafting us. Out of interest, if and it’s a big IF, the Premier League decided to say dock us points or whatever, what would be City’s line of appeal, would it be in court or back to CAS?
Never happened. You’ll be saying they killed some Italians and got the whole of English football banned for 5 years next, ffs.....
Unfortunately Henry Winter's article is yet another example of clicks being more valuable than reporting facts. None of these hacks seem to have the sense to wait until the full reasons are published before rushing to judgement.
I suspect that the strength of our case against the time-barred allegations was just as strong as for those that weren't but because they were time-barred CAS did not need to waste its time considering them.