CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

City’s only statement since the allegations was: “We will not be providing any comment on out of context materials purportedly hacked or stolen from City Football Group and Manchester City personnel and associated people. The attempt to damage the club’s reputation is organised and clear


And that is absolutely spot on
 
@Prestwich_Blue
A majority of the (three person) panel felt that we had acted legitimately. I assume that means we won on a majority 2-1 decision. If UEFA's case was so flimsy, how can one panel member have supported them? I'd be surprised if the media didn't make something of this.
Four on the panel... see last page
 
I doubt he messed with the emails. I’ve already asked Christoph on twitter how that night of happened

No, I wasn't suggesting that Pinto did, that was entirely down to Der Speilgel. I've added my voice to yours in asking Christoph for clarification.
 
So, immediate questions for me are
1. Where does this leave UEFA going forward
2. What, if anything do we do with those lobbying clubs, and what relationships we maintain with them
3. Will we make a legal example of any media personnel
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.