CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[Tricky_Trev]

How can they say they were accurate enough but also say they had been doctored and cobbled together to portray something else?

Because I could edit your post but the overall message put across still be the same.

 

[toutmaster]

This is a summary of City’s argument not a finding of fact by the panel.

Sorry my bad I was scanning through it so fast

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Blimey. Roan telling the truth. Amazed.

He wants to get back on The Etihad Campus and continue with a slice of MCFC hospitality.

 

[lancs blue]

I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?

They were two authentic emails combined into one, CAS ruled that although that gave a distorted impression the actual content of the emails was admissible.

 

[Tb1981]

Love it
Tariq parry lapdog panja says we had 12 lawyers and uefa only had 6!!!
But but but ....Miguel Delaney promised uefa had sent the A team this time!!!!

Maybe we had twice as much evidence to run through
Like 10 emails

 

[Blue&whitestripes]

As I said on another thread; this may well be a truly obnoxious piece of writing but, unless I am mistaken, all of it is true. The fact that little pieces have been extracted doesn’t make it less so.

Appreciate that point, but it's still possible to complain about the bias.
Which i'm inclined to do just to tie the fuckers up in dealing with it :)

 

[Claytop]

This is a summary of City’s argument not a finding of fact by the panel.

Probably explains my post further up!

 

[Hamann Pineapple]

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake

 

[Bellamy's Caddy]

Dan Roan re-tweeting Harris and Ziegler. He might have grudgingly reported the truth (eventually) on twitter but he's shown his true colours throughout this whole situation.

I watched Sky's coverage at 6pm and I thought they were very fair. They did mention the failure to comply with UEFA, but as a side point not the bulk of their report. They also called out that the hateful 8 for asking CAS to ignore our appeal for the ban to be suspended when we never made that appeal.

 

[Jam Tomorrow]

It also appears UEFA wanted to use stuff from 2012 & 2013, that was the only bits time barred. The vast majority of evidence was permissible but couldn’t prove wrong doing.