The initial headline I suspect stepped over the line.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)
- Thread starter jimharri
- Start date
Where's Daft Donald when you need him?Classic gaslighting of the City fanbase here, dressed up in a cynical and shabby cloak of fake reason, sincerity and reasonable debate. How odd that these WhatsApp wankers all chose to refer to us in eerily similar terms…
View attachment 21929View attachment 21930View attachment 21931
Surely he could of had a nice sit down chat with Harris and ironed a few things out
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
The last time I saw DD he would do more damage by sitting on him tbfWhere's Daft Donald when you need him?
Surely he could of had a nice sit down chat with Harris and ironed a few things out
That'll do for startersThe last time I saw DD he would do more damage by sitting on him tbf
Legal Alien
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2021
- Messages
- 3,601
- Team supported
- Manchester City
It's all re-hashed bollocks, but i reckon they know we're just about to spend some big money on signings, so they want to get their shots in first to taint that news.Think the yank owners are pushing this paying of certain reporters to keep this shitgoing! There are some bitter jealous owners!
You have to remember that we killed the golden goose and ruined their dream of the ESL. I am convinced that every other club, bar chelsea, would still be in that if we hadn't pulled out, or even been involved in the beginning!
Citizen Green
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 7,279
Ultimately last nights ‘developments’ from Mr. Harris read like this to me:
- Rehashing of previous issues already within public domain re email
- Regardless of how MCFC & Etihad communicate in said email, burden of proof comes down to financial transactions between the parties, these were provided to CAS last year & cleared City of the charge of disguising equity funding. Email(s) by and large irrelevant legally.
- Regardless of the above, email used for supposed new story is before PL FFP rules were implemented, if PL choose to proceed on basis supposed wrong-doings impacted future FFP periods they are outside 6 year SoL UK law
- Only way said above SoL law is ‘nullified’ & City ‘guilty’ is if it can be proven that owner funding was indeed disguised. This can’t be done using emails alone (see point 2) so incredibly high bar for PL to prove if it even comes down to that.
Basically storm in a teacup.
- Rehashing of previous issues already within public domain re email
- Regardless of how MCFC & Etihad communicate in said email, burden of proof comes down to financial transactions between the parties, these were provided to CAS last year & cleared City of the charge of disguising equity funding. Email(s) by and large irrelevant legally.
- Regardless of the above, email used for supposed new story is before PL FFP rules were implemented, if PL choose to proceed on basis supposed wrong-doings impacted future FFP periods they are outside 6 year SoL UK law
- Only way said above SoL law is ‘nullified’ & City ‘guilty’ is if it can be proven that owner funding was indeed disguised. This can’t be done using emails alone (see point 2) so incredibly high bar for PL to prove if it even comes down to that.
Basically storm in a teacup.
Last edited:
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Classic gaslighting of the City fanbase here, dressed up in a cynical and shabby cloak of fake reason, sincerity and reasonable debate. How odd that these WhatsApp wankers all chose to refer to us in eerily similar terms…
View attachment 21929View attachment 21930View attachment 21931
YAWN.
Doubt City fans would even bother this time.
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
He is genuinely as numb as a piss stone, mate. As thick as they come