CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

Having worked for American owners, they do seem to have a weird view on the world. Much like the UK did back in the 1860's. They don't seem to understand that you have to pay people decent wages in the UK. It is very much, what cash are you sending us this month, and how much can i leverage the business for, so I can pocket that as well.

Its the land of the free as long as you are white and very rich. By free they mean the law doesn’t apply to them. Over here they know that the rules do apply to them so let’s lobby everyone until it’s changed.
 
So the righteous holy and saintly arsenal preach at us for owner investment! Hmm

Arsenal are facing a deficit of 90 million this year and the interest on their 200 million plus loans are inxs of 10million.

So under FFP it’s ok for their majority shareholder to pay off the loans for them even if it’s still it a loan?
 
Unsurprisingly The Athletics article leads with the idea of Pep disrespecting Arsenal.

Not at all from the POV of City and how they’ve been treated by them in recent times.
 
Sam Lee at it again?

I can’t say but here’s a section. Gotta love the derogatory tone.

———

As is so often the case, an idea popped into Pep Guardiola’s head and he couldn’t resist saying it. He had been discussing the prospect of facing Watford and Norwich as preparation for Real Madrid when he went off on a tangent to get something off his chest.

It is the kind of comment that will attract plenty of headlines because it is, quite literally and very unapologetically, a lack of respect for another Premier League club.

Guardiola’s tendency to speak his mind has regularly been a problem for Manchester City’s communications department

———
 
Unsurprisingly The Athletics article leads with the idea of Pep disrespecting Arsenal.

Not at all from the POV of City and how they’ve been treated by them in recent times.

Ah, but this is standard practice for the RDAHMeedya. The DT Final Whistle article on the back page of the sport section rattles on about how lucrative fourth place in the PL can be, and they illustrate with a graphic - a shot from a match where Peter Crouch scores in the last minutes of a game at The Etihad, all the way back to 2010. Why not a graphic from 2011 when Crouch scores in the same net but with a different result? Why not from last year or any other year from the last decade? No, we have to pick the one that sees MCFC on the losing end!
 
Nothing wrong at all with Pep’s comments.

Unfortunately there’s someone on here posting a lot who is the biggest know it all I’ve seen. Knows more than the hierarchy about running a club, knows more than Pep about management and knows more about PR/legal than our own team.

Pep coming out with these Arsenal comments just goes to show he’s more ingrained with the club than ever.
Whomever could you mean?
 
Making up lies again.

Here’s a section -

As is so often the case, an idea popped into Pep Guardiola’s head and he couldn’t resist saying it. He had been discussing the prospect of facing Watford and Norwich as preparation for Real Madrid when he went off on a tangent to get something off his chest.

It is the kind of comment that will attract plenty of headlines because it is, quite literally and very unapologetically, a lack of respect for another Premier League club.

Guardiola’s tendency to speak his mind has regularly been a problem for Manchester City’s communications department

———

The article does provide some reasonings for the clubs position but it’s the initial portray of Guardiola which I take issue with. It’s been a big issue with the Athletic in how they write about him.
 
Here’s a section -

As is so often the case, an idea popped into Pep Guardiola’s head and he couldn’t resist saying it. He had been discussing the prospect of facing Watford and Norwich as preparation for Real Madrid when he went off on a tangent to get something off his chest.

It is the kind of comment that will attract plenty of headlines because it is, quite literally and very unapologetically, a lack of respect for another Premier League club.

Guardiola’s tendency to speak his mind has regularly been a problem for Manchester City’s communications department

You have literally cut off a sentence half way.

I wonder why? Oh right be ause it ends like this

but nobody at the club will have any issue with his latest outburst.

The bad blood with Arsenal goes back well before Guardiola’s arrival in England but he has been filled in on all the previous grievances, those which were stoked by Arsenal’s pursuit of Mikel Arteta in December.

Then it goes into a 500 word article explaining all of Citys problems with Arsenal from City's perspective.

Whatever you may think of City’s owners or how the club is run, it cannot be said that they have aired their grievances in public. They have listened to countless high-profile figures at clubs across Europe (there is a list) discussing or criticising their business in public since the 2008 takeover. Clearly, the likes of Liverpool, Jose Mourinho’s Tottenham, Borussia Dortmund and, you might assume, the entire Spanish top flight still believe City to be guilty.

City feel completely vindicated by their CAS win and while they do not appear to be in the “if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em” camp just yet, they certainly do not mind Guardiola airing a few grievances in the club’s name.​
 
You have literally cut off a sentence half way.

I wonder why? Oh right be ause it ends like this

but nobody at the club will have any issue with his latest outburst.

The bad blood with Arsenal goes back well before Guardiola’s arrival in England but he has been filled in on all the previous grievances, those which were stoked by Arsenal’s pursuit of Mikel Arteta in December.

Then it goes into a 500 word article explaining all of Citys problems with Arsenal from City's perspective.

Whatever you may think of City’s owners or how the club is run, it cannot be said that they have aired their grievances in public. They have listened to countless high-profile figures at clubs across Europe (there is a list) discussing or criticising their business in public since the 2008 takeover. Clearly, the likes of Liverpool, Jose Mourinho’s Tottenham, Borussia Dortmund and, you might assume, the entire Spanish top flight still believe City to be guilty.

City feel completely vindicated by their CAS win and while they do not appear to be in the “if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em” camp just yet, they certainly do not mind Guardiola airing a few grievances in the club’s name.​

Added more in my edit -

The article does provide some reasonings for the clubs position but it’s the initial portray of Guardiola which I take issue with. It’s been a big issue with the Athletic in how they write about him.
 
Added more in my edit -

The article does provide some reasonings for the clubs position but it’s the initial portray of Guardiola which I take issue with. It’s been a big issue with the Athletic in how they write about him.

Your problem is you think anything but unfettered propaganda for the club, the likes of which the Echo pump out for Liverpool, is anti-city.

Opening an article which is about how Pep went off tangent from a normal question to have a massive go at Arsenal by pointing out how Pep has a habit of going off on tangents is not an attack on City.
 
Unsurprisingly The Athletics article leads with the idea of Pep disrespecting Arsenal.

Not at all from the POV of City and how they’ve been treated by them in recent times.
just skimmed through the comments, didn't see one post off a City supporter, but reams of tedious, clueless ranting and insults that should be deleted on any site that expects posters to refrain from abuse in their replies.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top