balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 8,684
Gotcha. Not enough surely...They are simply saying Pearce was not a reliable witness ie lying. Time barring is irrelevant to the point.
Gotcha. Not enough surely...They are simply saying Pearce was not a reliable witness ie lying. Time barring is irrelevant to the point.
Why?City should not have put up Pearce...
https://www.spiegel.de/sport/cas-ur...ostrecke-3195c86c-975f-418e-bca8-194976c9ba34
Yes it was time barred,the media are going heavy on us getting off in part due to time barred evidence when it was one emailForgive me if i'm being stupid here, but if that e-mail is from 2013, wouldn't any alleged wrongdoing fall outside of the limitation period and be time-barred?
"We published some out-of-context, doctored emails to try to screw City. It didn't work. What next?"
"Let me think. I know! We'll publish some more out-of-context doctored emails."
"Genius".
Fuck sake. What else have these bastards got. No doubt now the full report from cas is out these pricks will be once again scouring the stolen emails to find any evidence we lied. Have a bad feeling about thisCity should not have put up Pearce...
https://www.spiegel.de/sport/cas-ur...ostrecke-3195c86c-975f-418e-bca8-194976c9ba34
LOL. Didn't take long for the first knicker-wetter to appear.Fuck sake. What else have these bastards got. No doubt now the full report from cas is out these pricks will be once again scouring the stolen emails to find any evidence we lied. Have a bad feeling about this
Can’t help but panic. Sick of it allLOL. Didn't take long for the first knicker-wetter to appear.