Champions League ban?

Rotweiller Harris's take is UEFA will go after post 2014 settlement for breaches:

9rk4uc.jpg
 
domalino said:
Hahaha. No.

The Premier League wage bill rules limit your increase to £19m a year.

United's increased by £30m last season, because the fine print in the rules allows you to increase your wage bill beyond limit if the money comes from "player sales, ticketing or commercial money".

I don't know where you got the idea they were stopped by Premier League rules but it's completely made up.

If you seriously think the Premier League would have rules which handcuff United I've got some tartan paint to sell you etc.
Click to expand...

if thats the case why didnt they back mourinho with the defender he wanted?! we will see in January because they need to spend big to fill all those gaps if they sell a few players they will buy if they dont they wont
 
waspish said:
if thats the case why didnt they back mourinho with the defender he wanted?! we will see in January because they need to spend big to fill all those gaps if they sell a few players they will buy if they dont they wont
Click to expand...

Because they aren't interested in giving him another £70m for a 30 year old CB to go after the £60m he's already wasted on Bailly & the swede.
 
Rolee said:
What's the second tweet about where he says City were speculating on their website?
Click to expand...
Probably the what the media says pages, which probably mentioned that Rob Harris was talking out his arse again.
 
Rolee said:
What's the second tweet about where he says City were speculating on their website?
Click to expand...
That's really funny. They were retweeting stories that were already in the national media speculating on other FFP cases. In other words, they were just retweeting shite that him or his colleagues had written.
 
Marvin said:
It's £7m subject to revenue uplift....which will be the "players sales, ticketing or commercial money" I guess. I looked at their 1st Qtr results earlier this year and found that their wages had gone up by £7.1m and concluded they had a problem but admittedly the revenue uplift provides a get out. The thing is Ed Woodward is predicting revenue increases of about £25m for this financial year. Does than mean that they can increase wages by up to £25m pa? I couldn't work it out by just reading the rulebook. It didn't explain how you translate revenue increases to wage bill increase. If their entire revenue uplift can be applied to their wage bill then they are in the clear, but do you know that for sure?
Click to expand...

well they be fcuked next seaosn without champs league football money of around 50m
 
waspish said:
Maguire isnt 30 they wont be soending big in january be swaps at best
Click to expand...

Mourinho won't make it past May so why give him any more in January?

You can pretend the worlds richest club can't afford any players if you want, or you could just look at the more likely scenario, they aren't letting Mourinho lump them with 3 or 4 more players who'd underperform and steal a wage for 6 months and then not be wanted by the new guy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.