BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 25,931
Er.......
So... we were the better team. If Liverpool had been better they would had the benefit of going first.
Er.......
Looks like your under attack...So... we were the better team. If Liverpool had been better they would had the benefit of going first.
His what is under attack? Does your mother know that you don't know the difference between your and you're.Looks like your under attack...
Did you watch the video?So... we were the better team. If Liverpool had been better they would had the benefit of going first.
Did I need too? Myself and my eldest daughter were there and saw it in glorious real-life. Liverpool took the first pen and although they scored the 1st pen and we missed our 1st pen we won. Their team was not good enough. We beat the odds - probably because we were the better team.Did you watch the video?
Well then; unless I'm being clarkied big time, or am missing something, I don't understand your earlier post;Did I need too? Myself and my eldest daughter were there and saw it in glorious real-life. Liverpool took the first pen and although they scored the 1st pen and we missed our 1st pen we won. Their team was not good enough. We beat the odds - probably because we were the better team.
http://www.soccermetrics.net/paper-...ick-shootout-paper-apesteguia-palacios-huerta
Are you saying there that Liverpool didn't go first, whereas in your latest reply you correctly say that Liverpool did go first. Am I misreading your post?So... we were the better team. If Liverpool had been better they would had the benefit of going first.
Sorry Angle eyes.His what is under attack? Does your mother know that you don't know the difference between your and you're.
As in the difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're (not you, obviously!) shit?His what is under attack? Does your mother know that you don't know the difference between your and you're.