rastus
Well-Known Member
danburge82 said:
I agree with this option.
It makes sense on many levels & globally challenge the CL...A bit of competition would be a good thing
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
"Chelsea and City face Euro Ban"
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
I agree with this option.
It makes sense on many levels & globally challenge the CL...A bit of competition would be a good thing
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Could any of you guys present a list of clubs in the premiership who would currently meet the criteria laid out by FFPR? I'm pretty sure there wont be many.......
Rammyblues
Well-Known Member
Those likely to be involved in CL and EL next year
1) Rags - large debt but make a profit each year they are OK
2) Arsenal - They I suspect are fine
3) Newcastle - cleared most of their debt when they went down by getting rid of expensive players so I suspect they will be OK
4) Liverpool - Debt cleared in takeover assume they are back on even keel
5) Spurs - no idea they seem to spend mega bucks on players but wages seem low in comparison so I expect them to be OK
6) Chelsea & City see thread
Rest of premier league doesn't matter they aren't involved in Europe, if however Everton get there they only lose about 5m so would be deemed acceptable given the totlerances built in. So with Chelsea and City being the stand out two I reckon this is why we get the constant shite written about us.
1) Rags - large debt but make a profit each year they are OK
2) Arsenal - They I suspect are fine
3) Newcastle - cleared most of their debt when they went down by getting rid of expensive players so I suspect they will be OK
4) Liverpool - Debt cleared in takeover assume they are back on even keel
5) Spurs - no idea they seem to spend mega bucks on players but wages seem low in comparison so I expect them to be OK
6) Chelsea & City see thread
Rest of premier league doesn't matter they aren't involved in Europe, if however Everton get there they only lose about 5m so would be deemed acceptable given the totlerances built in. So with Chelsea and City being the stand out two I reckon this is why we get the constant shite written about us.
Dubai Blue said:Thankfully, I can see it all coming crashing down around UEFA's feet in the not-so-distant future.BTH said:Let's do something really radical and tell UEFA that we don't want to be in their CL. There, I've said it. Let's make a stand for a season. Tell them it's rotten. Because it is. The shine's long come off it.
no way. Will be very popular for a very long time..
So is this fair play shit a lie or legit?
dctid said:graham1312 said:i can not see uefa bring in any bans due to the fact that i would suspect that the arab nations and probably russian buisnesses put a lot of money into the sponsorships of the competitions and you do not bite the hand that feeds you
Do they are you really sure that they do
Certainly if they do they are not on the list of major sponsors whom appear to be
Ford
Hieneken
Mastercard
Sony and a few others
not many russian or Arab sounding names there.
lol, you think the Arabs and Russians don't have a major share just because the above names of companies are American, Japanese etc? They usually setup proxy companies to invest in such companies..
and there are team sponsors like Emirates and Etihad who would raise a huge ruckus if the team they sponsor were to be banned. It would be a loss of investment for them..