super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 45,480
Even so, thank fuck we didnt get him.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Chelsea thread 2019/20
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 16,743
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
I'm hoping giggs and John Terry.This 100%, but who will they get when Pep and Klopp leave? Not Pep and Klopp, that's certain.
BosnianBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jan 2019
- Messages
- 4,003
- Team supported
- City
That Abraham fucker scores against anyone but wouldn't score in Liverpool brothel.
Bpughh
Well-Known Member
what was the reason azpili's was dissallowed? only saw the highlights and was in a foreign language
BosnianBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jan 2019
- Messages
- 4,003
- Team supported
- City
what was the reason azpili's was dissallowed? only saw the highlights and was in a foreign language
offside in the buildup
offside from the kick off
Sorted it for you, love;)
what was the reason azpili's was dissallowed? only saw the highlights and was in a foreign language
People may moan about going back so far in the build up to call an offside (about 8 or 9 passes earlier) but it was in the same attacking phase as the goal, so currently ruled out imo.
However the free kick they scored the 2nd goal was poor decision.
BosnianBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jan 2019
- Messages
- 4,003
- Team supported
- City
People may moan about going back so far in the build up to call an offside (about 8 or 9 passes earlier) but it was in the same attacking phase as the goal, so currently ruled out imo.
However the free kick they scored the 2nd goal was poor decision.
It was clear foul. I was going mad thinking it's nothing in real time, but replays showed it was 100% foul.
It was clear foul. I was going mad thinking it's nothing in real time, but replays showed it was 100% foul.
On second viewing, it possibly was a foul. It just felt like a proper punch in the gut just seconds after the VAR decision.
That’s not the case at all.
Jorginho was forced to join Chelsea as part of the deal that allowed the Pensioners to take Sarri from Napoli.
He wanted to come to City.
He's lucky he joined them - nowhere near good enough for us. On admittedly limited evidence, Rodri looks a superior player by some distance
- Status
- Not open for further replies.