You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
Inter Me Nan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 10,541
Danke.Nick Harris is a ****.
According to my sources.
Nick Harris is a ****.
According to my sources.
I concur. He's one of only three people (to my knowledge) who have blocked me on Twitter, along with Jamie Jackson and Scott the Red. What's the collective noun for a bunch of cunts?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
"A press pack"What's the collective noun for a bunch of cunts?
Paul Lake's Left Knee
Well-Known Member
I concur. He's one of only three people (to my knowledge) who have blocked me on Twitter, along with Jamie Jackson and Scott the Red. What's the collective noun for a bunch of cunts?
I believe its a thunder of cunts.
Edit - the urban dictionary actually suggests it a shower of cunts.
I've never seen a controversial tweet from you ever! Haha! How do you manage to get blocked?I concur. He's one of only three people (to my knowledge) who have blocked me on Twitter, along with Jamie Jackson and Scott the Red. What's the collective noun for a bunch of cunts?
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
And completely misleading as well. The concept of fair market value only applies to transactions with what are known as related parties and Etihad, as I've said before, is not a related party. That's a standard and long-established accounting concept and, if they were, would have been declared as such in our accounts. The fact that our owner, a private individual, is a member of the ruling family of Abu Dhabi is not enough, in itself, to make City & Etihad related parties.I see Nick Harris still hasn't got over his bitterness towards us. Phenomenally biased article, as always.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...eague-bans-plea-bargain-punishments-2014.html
Therefore UEFA had no grounds to investigate or adjust these, as he's trying to imply. So this wasn't done by or on behalf of UEFA. His "independent assessor" is probably our old friend Ed Thompson.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Moderators?What's the collective noun for a bunch of cunts?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Plus, anyone who isn't a **** (according to my sources) would know that the Etihad deal was some way below market value in 2014, and is more significantly so, now.And completely misleading as well. The concept of fair market value only applies to transactions with what are known as related parties and Etihad, as I've said before, is not a related party. That's a standard and long-established accounting concept and, if they were, would have been declared as such in our accounts. The fact that our owner, a private individual, is a member of the ruling family of Abu Dhabi is not enough, in itself, to make City & Etihad related parties.
Therefore UEFA had no grounds to investigate or adjust these, as he's trying to imply. So this wasn't done by or on behalf of UEFA. His "independent assessor" is probably our old friend Ed Thompson.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
The Qatar Tourist Authority/PSG deal was marked down to €100m I seem to recall as part of their agreement with UEFA and that was just a shirt naming deal. Etihad, at maybe €50m, covered shirts, stadium and campus.Plus, anyone who isn't a **** (according to my sources) would know that the Etihad deal was some way below market value in 2014, and is more significantly so, now.