Hart of the Matter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 5,180
Re: City & FFP (continued)
Avram Grant - legend. Sticking it to FFP on Sky
Avram Grant - legend. Sticking it to FFP on Sky
I like this song, it needs more versesPrestwich_Blue said:We should be singing this little gem that was posted a few days ago:
"UEFA told Sheikh Mansour
To sell his Lamborghini.
But he'll do what the hell he wants,
So fuck yourself Platini."
City Raider said:I'd imagine the club are geared up to challenge but sensitive to how it is perceived. We've been trying to conduct a charm offensive for sme time and the last thing we need is to be seen as the club who take on the 'rules' the rest of the football world/media seem to agree with - despite us all knowing how flawed they are.
Short term we might concede to a few things while longer term quielty supporting someone else's challenge.
aguero93:20 said:Legality of FFP coming right into the Public Domain across a lot of channels this morning, PSG and MCFC gearing up for a challenge?Twitter said:Matt Cutler @mattycutler · 11m
Some Man City/PSG points of appeal: (1) FFP contravenes EU competition law; (2) sanctions are disproportionate to the offence; ...
Matt Cutler @mattycutler · 10m
... (3) how can UEFA calculate the fair market price of a sponsorship deal? (re: Man City/Etihad and PSG/Qatar Tourism Authority)
There's always need for sarcasm.Pam said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:Pam said:Lets get our lawyers to work on it.
That's a brilliant idea Pam - you should suggest it to the club, as I bet it hasn't even occurred to them.
No need for sarcasm. What I meant is, don't be rolling over for the twats. Don't be accepting it.
J.L. Duponte? :)Cheadle Blue said:aguero93:20 said:OK I'll outline a few basic points for you:[MU]Prodigy said:No, I just doubt UEFA are stupid enough to action these level of sanctions without knowing precisely where they stand legally (although, I wouldn't put it past down).
Again, it shouldn't be near £50 million, and it shouldn't be near the same level as PSG. The squad reduction would be more than adequate.
-The EU and EU law take precedence over everyone else - they're the biggest fish in the pond
-You cannot limit equity investment under EU law
-You cannot limit salaries under EU law without the prior agreement of the workers affected, this hasn't been done with footballers
-FFPR aren't fit for their stated purpose - they limit investment not debt. (so not viable)
-Places in the Champions League have never been awarded via invite, they are awarded via merit and have been every season - top 3 in England, Spain, Germany plus Playoff round winners etc etc etc - UEFA can claim it's an invite only competition, but it won't stand up in a court of law
-Antitrust law forbids Cartels - the CL will be in danger of being named such a Cartel if it's turned into a closed shop through UEFA regulations.
Comprende?
When you see that mate, its mad isn't it? imagine what a TOP barrister would make of it all, no offence to yourself like
Pam said:Anyway, fuck it. Bigger fish to fry just now.
inbetween said:Is anyone surprised? This is a photo of UEFA's licensing Committee
And look who is front left centre, Chairman of the UEFA Licensing Committee - David Gill, former CEO of Manchester United.