Re: City & FFP (continued)
I think that you are both correct.
ADUG will be chuckling away to themselves today. The club have expressed just enough of an objection to be noted but then have allowed themselves enough wiggle room to play the martyr and go along with it [with a deep sigh of resignation].
It's media that have been played and not us!
As Marvin said [and I mentioned before most of you were up in the UK], it'll all be tomorrow's chip paper soon enough.
So can we now get back to the usual nonsense of wild transfer speculation and made-up ITKs? Cheers!
fbloke said:tolmie's hairdoo said:I think we are all being played, it smacks of Uefa and City being in bed over this all along?
All window dressing, keeps the G14 from turning on Uefa, plastic enough sanctions for City to more than work around them.
City's warning to UEFA, and what amounts to the ECA and the G14 to play fair is significant.
As City move into very profitable times we could easily become the ones who challenge other clubs who fail FFP.
Also, as I talked of ages ago on this thread City have agreed to keep things simple for UEFA to run the FFP regs more easily. I talked about City changing the way football clubs work and FFP having to keep up, well it seems that City have taken one on the chin to allow UEFA to develop things within FFP to match the new reality.
I think that you are both correct.
ADUG will be chuckling away to themselves today. The club have expressed just enough of an objection to be noted but then have allowed themselves enough wiggle room to play the martyr and go along with it [with a deep sigh of resignation].
It's media that have been played and not us!
As Marvin said [and I mentioned before most of you were up in the UK], it'll all be tomorrow's chip paper soon enough.
So can we now get back to the usual nonsense of wild transfer speculation and made-up ITKs? Cheers!