kaz7
Well-Known Member
Erm..damn..i don't have an excuse,i just amWhat’s your excuse for being useless now flower? ;)
Erm..damn..i don't have an excuse,i just amWhat’s your excuse for being useless now flower? ;)
Erm..damn..i don't have an excuse,i just am
Guess you'll be starting a group arguing that City should charge people to use toilet paper at football matches, then?You wildly missed my point there mate.
What I was inferring was if they can afford the match (£35+) they can’t be claiming ‘poverty’ can they ffs.
Next you’ll be telling me fellas should get free tissues to stave of ‘wank poverty’.
Give your head a wobble.
Guess you'll be starting a group arguing that City should charge people to use toilet paper at football matches, then?
Providing free sanitary products at football games isn't to do with period poverty - that's something related but something different.
Are you purposely being obtuse?
On the Ball is about period poverty ie not having the financial resources to buy your tampons etc. Simple as that.
My original point stands. If you can’t afford the £2 for a box of 20 (as I’m reliably informed) you have no place spending £35+ on going to watch the match. Any reasonable woman would put her basic needs before football.
What on earth cant you get your head round about that?
Oh and btw I think it’s s great cause. For those who actually need it. Someone who can afford the match doesn’t ‘need’ free tampons.
Irrespective of your point. It may just be that a lady comes on her period at the match and hasn’t got products on her. So now the club have made this small gesture. Can only be a positive.
Well done once again city.
Well said WW, the amount of women and girls at games these days is huge,this is a welcome initativeIrrespective of your point. It may just be that a lady comes on her period at the match and hasn’t got products on her. So now the club have made this small gesture. Can only be a positive.
Well done once again city.
Which is lovely but has fuck all to do with period poverty mate.