gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I can neither confirm nor deny that.Are you able to confirm that you can confirm they are unconfirmed?
I can neither confirm nor deny that.Are you able to confirm that you can confirm they are unconfirmed?
Neville is an opportunist. Everything he says and does is calculated and designed to boost his private business interests.Absolutely 100%.
Ratboy's mask has slipped far too often and you only need to look at his behaviour as a Rag player to see what an absolute twat he was then, he's no different now except that he's also a self serving twat with an agenda.
Spitty has showed what a vile excuse for a human being he is by spitting on a teenager from his car window and the fact that Sly waited for the fuss to die down before bringing him back instead of sacking him on the spot shows what an equally vile and immortal shitstain of an organisation they are.
Does that mean that there's no way of telling what's a related party transaction for clubs owned by hedge funds?
Are other exceptionally wealthy people referred to by the source of their income in the way we are? Not so much. It's stated with a soupçon of discriminatory vitriol.I understand that point, but I don't think this is the same, because my argument is that it's relevant. It's not just very wealthy owners, it's owners with the resources of a nation state (which our owners indirectly have, even if we're not state owned).
And those of Peter Lim.Neville is an opportunist. Everything he says and does is calculated and designed to boost his private business interests.
Are other exceptionally wealthy people referred to by the source of their income in the way are? Not so much. It's stated with a soupçon of discriminatory vitriol.
Not really and certainly not constantly. Besides, that would be presumably accurate. Just like saying we are owned by a private equity company would be.Don't we often hear of "hedge-fund owned clubs", or "American owned"?
Your point is irrelevant in legal terms. What may or may not be is just the same as a rumour from a mate of a second cousin who knew the gardener etc etcOur owner (and I know some will argue that Sheikh Mansour is not our owner), is in a totally different league to Todd Boehly, in terms of personal wealth, access to finance, and influence.
Khaldoon and Mansour are the CEO and chair of Mubadala, which on its own is three times the size of Silverlake. It's not realistic to suggest that they have no influence over other companies that are linked to the UAE state. It's not a trap, it's common sense, and our board wouldn't get very far if they tried to pretend the Sheikh is just some rich bloke, who may or may not know a few other rich blokes in the UAE.
I thought it was just Khaldoon on Mubadala board my mistake my point was that you can have millions of connections but what matters is being on the board or owning a company. Since we are not owned by the UAE government or one of its State companies. We have less power than people think. The sheik won’t get any favors for knowing presidents and prime ministers but Todd can get favors through his equity people. Knowing people only gets you so far you have to be able to give them something legitimately or off the books.Our owner (and I know some will argue that Sheikh Mansour is not our owner), is in a totally different league to Todd Boehly, in terms of personal wealth, access to finance, and influence.
Khaldoon and Mansour are the CEO and chair of Mubadala, which on its own is three times the size of Silverlake. It's not realistic to suggest that they have no influence over other companies that are linked to the UAE state. It's not a trap, it's common sense, and our board wouldn't get very far if they tried to pretend the Sheikh is just some rich bloke, who may or may not know a few other rich blokes in the UAE.
Your fucking joking !!No, but I’ve just found out that Dave Whelan broke his leg in the 1960 FA Cup Final