City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[HelloCity]

 

[Francis Crawford]

this is hilaruous.

every paper, talksport and other media outlet covering it as a seismic win for city and the bbc with a vanilla no opinion telling of the facts.

fuck you Dan Roan and Phil Mcnulty

What do u expect ?the bbc still can bring them selves to say Hamas is a terror organisation!

 

[Kippaxpete]

I am getting these shirts printed in all sizes for my pop up City apparel shop ahead of the Wolves game. ;-)

Joking aside Seb, I'd buy one! I'm sure they'd sell like hotcakes.

 

[Citizen of Legoland]

How on earth do they work out that united owe £0 to their owner ?

The rag owners owe money to the banks, that’s their debt.

 

[cleavers]

Congratulations on your job at the bbc

Haha, the idea of reading something that long, full of legal fuckwittery, is enough to make go to sleep.

 

[skillman]

At last, an actual reason to dislike Bournemouth

 

[Coatigan]

When's that from?

 

[mancboy]

At last, an actual reason to dislike Bournemouth

Go to bournemouth and spend 10 minutes there and ull have plenty

 

[halfcenturyup]

Presumably that clubs can’t take the piss by signing ludicrous sponsorships, and the PL can’t take the piss by trying to block reasonable deals.

I don't understand, for the love of God, why the PL doesn't just adopt the same financial rules as UEFA. The top seven clubs have to comply with them anyway. Even do away with FFP for clubs not in Europe.

Why not do something simple instead of something mind-bogglingly complicated (and crazy expensive).

The award says the PL has had to beef up its APT team to handle the workload and has even had to pay Nielsen more to beef up their team as well? Is it all worth it?

 

[JASR]

Yes but it will be applied differently by the Panel as there won't be any time-barring in place.

Dear god. Read the fucking CAS verdict.

There is no time barring.
The ‘time barred’ stuff couldn’t be adjudicated on by CAS, but they said they’d be on city’s side even if it wasn’t. That’s doubly damning - going out of their way to make a point about ‘time barring’ being irrelevant in a ruling they didn’t need to comment on.

And as per your earlier comment about ‘disguised owner investment’ - read the fucking CAS ruling. ‘No evidence’ was CAS verdict, not once, not twice but iirc 11 times.

IIRC I’ve already (months ago) called you out and said ‘read the CAS verdict’. You seem incapable of doing the basics of reading facts, and just spout hopes and opinions.

You are a wum