Mmmmm... You see the issue with this is sponsorship is only valued at what someone is willing to pay. This is where everything gets murky.
I was having it with a braindead Rag today, & said to him that the PL came to the conclusion that our sponsorship level is around or below that of Everton, Villa & WHU.
I shit you not, he said those clubs have a storied histories & loyal global fanbases, with packed grounds every week & fans that will follow them everywhere, hence why the PL placed our sponsorship level beneath theirs!
Obviously I was setting a trap for him about our rejected level of sponsorship, as the details have never been revealed to my knowledge, but this illustrates the lobotomised level of dialogue City fans have to deal with in defence of our club.
Pointing out that we'd won 5 of the last 6 PLs, were reigning World Champions & former CL & UEFA Super Cup champions, & were rated by OPTA as the best football team in the world didn't matter. Everton winning the 1985 First Division title under Howard Kendall was a bigger achievement than anything we've ever managed in our history.
So if PIF had a controlling interest in Clearlake, who had a controlling interest in Newcastle, that would be OK?
He’s an egregiously bad faith actor, irrespective.@slbsn did say on here yesterday, that like it or not, panja is connected and has good sources
Does it state them as a no goer? Or does it set them aside?That the assessments used to declare the sponsorships were not fair market value weren’t fit for purpose.
I was until I read this fucking thread!! :-)
I've been observing events over the past 24 hours or so and my mind keeps referring back to a scene or two in 'The Godfather'.Just noticed the remarkable similarity between this scenario and the Black Knight on Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
Go and watch it with City and the PL in mind.
(Sorry - don’t know how to attach things)
That and the most watched football team globally, but no, Everton's First Division title in 1985 & the 39,000 they get at Goodison makes them a FAR bigger club than City will ever be... \0/You could always point out that we are the second biggest brand in football in 2024. We were the biggest brand in 2023. Evaluation carried out by Brand Finance.
I'd fundamentally disagree with that assertion. Panja's main sources are Gill & Parry, plus probably Nick Harris. That's not "good sources".@slbsn did say on here yesterday, that like it or not, panja is connected and has good sources