This is my whole point and I agree with you. People don’t address the bit in bold below though there maybe more to it than I understand.
that the APT Rules are unlawful on account of being in breach of sections 2 and 18 of the Competition Act 1998 because they exclude from their scope shareholder loans and for no other reason;
Depends if you want it spelling correctly or not, I guess.Or not ? !
Benchmarking = a useful indicator of yesterday.This is the underlying issue with benchmarking. A place I worked used to be subjected to benchmarking by the two "biggest and best" benchmarking firms in our sector and it was fairly farcical, for all but the simplest elements you could drive a horse and coach through the 'science' of it. There's a saying in this space "all models are wrong, some are useful" - benchmarking works best when it's used as a strategic tool for discussion and planning between parties that are acting in good faith. Once you start trying to run contracts from it, though you initially might get a fuzzy warm feeling from the 'objectivity' you thought you'd brought to proceedings, you find it all goes to ratshit pdq. At the point when lawyers are arguing about the benchmarks it's a good indication your business relationship is f****d. .
According to this thread, Stefan was having a blow job off Margot last week, how is he supposed to know which one is prettier until Keira gets under his desk too?There was no attack on your reputation Stefan. You’re very highly regarded. Saying I believe Margot Robbie to be prettier than Keira Knightly doesn’t mean Knightly is a moose.
He can’t resign until after the 115 case. To do so would completely undermine the PL’s position midway through the hearing.
But my strong suspicion is an exit plan will already be in place.
This is the underlying issue with benchmarking. We used to be subjected to benchmarking by the two "biggest and best" benchmarking firms in our sector and it was fairly farcical, for all but the simplest elements you could drive a horse and coach through the 'science' of it. There's a saying in this space "all models are wrong, some are useful" - benchmarking works best when it's used as a strategic tool for discussion and planning between parties that are acting in good faith. Once you start trying to run contracts from it, though you initially might get a fuzzy warm feeling from the 'objectivity' you thought you'd brought to proceedings, you find it all goes to ratshit pdq. At the point when lawyers are arguing about the benchmarks it's a good indication your business relationship is f****d. .
You can as long as it passes the fair market value test.What I don't understand is how the owner of Leicester can use his own company to sponsor his statium and shirts ?
This never brought up. You can't a have sponsor who's related to you.
You can sponsor your own shirt and statium and give free loads.
I don't understand how Leicester have got away with this
Margot can't bend it like BeckhamAccording to this thread, Stefan was having a blow job off Margot last week, how is he supposed to know which one is prettier until Keira gets under his desk too?